Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Investigation of Carers' Perspectives of Dementia Misconceptions on Twitter: Focus Group Study.
Hudson, Georgie; Jansli, Sonja M; Erturk, Sinan; Morris, Daniel; Odoi, Clarissa M; Clayton-Turner, Angela; Bray, Vanessa; Yourston, Gill; Clouden, Doreen; Proudfoot, David; Cornwall, Andrew; Waldron, Claire; Wykes, Til; Jilka, Sagar.
  • Hudson G; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Jansli SM; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Erturk S; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Morris D; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Odoi CM; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Clayton-Turner A; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Bray V; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Yourston G; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Clouden D; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Proudfoot D; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Cornwall A; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Waldron C; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Wykes T; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Jilka S; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
JMIR Aging ; 5(1): e30388, 2022 Jan 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1662507
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Dementia misconceptions on social media are common, with negative effects on people with the condition, their carers, and those who know them. This study codeveloped a thematic framework with carers to understand the forms these misconceptions take on Twitter.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study is to identify and analyze types of dementia conversations on Twitter using participatory methods.

METHODS:

A total of 3 focus groups with dementia carers were held to develop a framework of dementia misconceptions based on their experiences. Dementia-related tweets were collected from Twitter's official application programming interface using neutral and negative search terms defined by the literature and by carers (N=48,211). A sample of these tweets was selected with equal numbers of neutral and negative words (n=1497), which was validated in individual ratings by carers. We then used the framework to analyze, in detail, a sample of carer-rated negative tweets (n=863).

RESULTS:

A total of 25.94% (12,507/48,211) of our tweet corpus contained negative search terms about dementia. The carers' framework had 3 negative and 3 neutral categories. Our thematic analysis of carer-rated negative tweets found 9 themes, including the use of weaponizing language to insult politicians (469/863, 54.3%), using dehumanizing or outdated words or statements about members of the public (n=143, 16.6%), unfounded claims about the cures or causes of dementia (n=11, 1.3%), or providing armchair diagnoses of dementia (n=21, 2.4%).

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the first study to use participatory methods to develop a framework that identifies dementia misconceptions on Twitter. We show that misconceptions and stigmatizing language are not rare. They manifest through minimizing and underestimating language. Web-based campaigns aiming to reduce discrimination and stigma about dementia could target those who use negative vocabulary and reduce the misconceptions that are being propagated, thus improving general awareness.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: JMIR Aging Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 30388

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: JMIR Aging Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 30388