Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus.
Eriksson, Elof; Liu, Paul Y; Schultz, Gregory S; Martins-Green, Manuela M; Tanaka, Rica; Weir, Dot; Gould, Lisa J; Armstrong, David G; Gibbons, Gary W; Wolcott, Randy; Olutoye, Oluyinka O; Kirsner, Robert S; Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
  • Eriksson E; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Liu PY; Department of Plastic Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Schultz GS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Institute for Wound Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FA, USA.
  • Martins-Green MM; Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, Laboratory of Wound Healing Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
  • Tanaka R; Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Weir D; Saratoga Hospital Center for Wound Healing and Hyperbaric Medicine, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA.
  • Gould LJ; Department of Surgery, South Shore Hospital, South Weymouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Armstrong DG; Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Gibbons GW; Boston University School of Medicine, Center for Wound Healing South Shore Health, Weymouth, MA, USA.
  • Wolcott R; Southwest Regional WCC, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
  • Olutoye OO; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Kirsner RS; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Gurtner GC; Dr Philip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FA, USA.
Wound Repair Regen ; 30(2): 156-171, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1673326
ABSTRACT
The Wound Healing Foundation (WHF) recognised a need for an unbiased consensus on the best treatment of chronic wounds. A panel of 13 experts were invited to a virtual meeting which took place on 27 March 2021. The proceedings were organised in the sub-sections diagnosis, debridement, infection control, dressings, grafting, pain management, oxygen treatment, outcomes and future needs. Eighty percent or better concurrence among the panellists was considered a consensus. A large number of critical questions were discussed and agreed upon. Important takeaways included that wound care needs to be simplified to a point that it can be delivered by the patient or the patient's family. Another one was that telemonitoring, which has proved very useful during the COVID-19 pandemic, can help reduce the frequency of interventions by a visiting nurse or a wound care center. Defining patient expectations is critical to designing a successful treatment. Patient outcomes might include wound specific outcomes such as time to heal, wound size reduction, as well as improvement in quality of life. For those patients with expectations of healing, an aggressive approach to achieve that goal is recommended. When healing is not an expectation, such as in patients receiving palliative wound care, outcomes might include pain reduction, exudate management, odour management and/or other quality of life benefits to wound care.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wound Healing / COVID-19 Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Wound Repair Regen Journal subject: Dermatology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wrr.12994

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wound Healing / COVID-19 Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Wound Repair Regen Journal subject: Dermatology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wrr.12994