Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Experiences and well-being of healthcare professionals working in the field of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic were evolving: a cross-sectional survey study.
Bourne, Tom; Kyriacou, Christopher; Shah, Harsha; Ceusters, Jolien; Preisler, Jessica; Metzger, Ulrike; Landolfo, Chiara; Lees, Christoph; Timmerman, Dirk.
  • Bourne T; Early Pregnancy and Acute Gynaecology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK t.bourne@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Kyriacou C; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Shah H; Early Pregnancy and Acute Gynaecology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Ceusters J; Early Pregnancy and Acute Gynaecology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Preisler J; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Metzger U; Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
  • Landolfo C; Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana, Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile José Joaquín Aguirre, Santiago, Chile.
  • Lees C; Département d'échographie en Gynécologie et Obstétrique, Centre d'Échographie de l'Odéon, Paris, France.
  • Timmerman D; Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e051700, 2022 02 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1673428
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Assess experience of healthcare professionals (HCPs) working with ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology during the evolving SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, given the new and unprecedented challenges involving viral exposure, personal protective equipment (PPE) and well-being.

DESIGN:

Prospective cross-sectional survey study.

SETTING:

Online international survey. Single-best, open box and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questions.

PARTICIPANTS:

The survey was sent to 35 509 HCPs in 124 countries and was open from 7 to 21 May 2020. 2237/3237 (69.1%) HCPs from 115 countries who consented to participate completed the survey. 1058 (47.3%) completed the HADS. PRIMARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, depression and anxiety among HCPs in relation to country and PPE availability. ANALYSES Univariate analyses were used to investigate associations without generating erroneous causal conclusions.

RESULTS:

Confirmed/suspected SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was 13.0%. PPE provision concerns were raised by 74.1% of participants; highest among trainees/resident physicians (83.9%) and among HCPs in Spain (89.7%). Most participants worked in self-perceived high-risk areas with SARS-CoV-2 (67.5%-87.0%), with proportionately more trainees interacting with suspected/confirmed infected patients (57.1% vs 24.2%-40.6%) and sonographers seeing more patients who did not wear a mask (33.3% vs 13.9%-7.9%). The most frequent PPE combination used was gloves and a surgical mask (22.3%). UK and US respondents reported spending less time self-isolating (8.8 days) and lower satisfaction with their national pandemic response (37.0%-43.0%). 19.8% and 8.8% of respondents met the criteria for moderate to severe anxiety and depression, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Reported prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in HCPs is consistent with literature findings. Most respondents used gloves and a surgical mask, with a greater SARS-CoV-2 prevalence compared with those using 'full' PPE. HCPs with the least agency (trainees and sonographers) were not only more likely to see high-risk patients but also less likely to be protected. A fifth of respondents reported moderate to severe anxiety.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Gynecology / Obstetrics Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-051700

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Gynecology / Obstetrics Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-051700