Your browser doesn't support javascript.
On the resilience of health systems: A methodological exploration across countries in the WHO African Region.
Karamagi, Humphrey Cyprian; Titi-Ofei, Regina; Kipruto, Hillary Kipchumba; Seydi, Aminata Benitou-Wahebine; Droti, Benson; Talisuna, Ambrose; Tsofa, Benjamin; Saikat, Sohel; Schmets, Gerard; Barasa, Edwine; Tumusiime, Prosper; Makubalo, Lindiwe; Cabore, Joseph Waogodo; Moeti, Matshidiso.
  • Karamagi HC; Data, Analytics and Knowledge Management - WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Titi-Ofei R; Data, Analytics and Knowledge Management - WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Kipruto HK; Health Information Systems team - WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Seydi AB; Data, Analytics and Knowledge Management - WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Droti B; Health Information Systems team - WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Talisuna A; Emergency Preparedness and Response Cluster - WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Tsofa B; Health Policy and Systems Research Team - KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Saikat S; Health Services Resilience Team - World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Schmets G; Primary Health Care Special Programme - World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Barasa E; Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Tumusiime P; Health Systems Expert, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Makubalo L; Assistant Regional Director, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Cabore JW; Director of Program Management, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
  • Moeti M; Regional Director, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0261904, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1674004
ABSTRACT
The need for resilient health systems is recognized as important for the attainment of health outcomes, given the current shocks to health services. Resilience has been defined as the capacity to "prepare and effectively respond to crises; maintain core functions; and, informed by lessons learnt, reorganize if conditions require it". There is however a recognized dichotomy between its conceptualization in literature, and its application in practice. We propose two mutually reinforcing categories of resilience, representing resilience targeted at potentially known shocks, and the inherent health system resilience, needed to respond to unpredictable shock events. We determined capacities for each of these categories, and explored this methodological proposition by computing country-specific scores against each capacity, for the 47 Member States of the WHO African Region. We assessed face validity of the computed index, to ensure derived values were representative of the different elements of resilience, and were predictive of health outcomes, and computed bias-corrected non-parametric confidence intervals of the emergency preparedness and response (EPR) and inherent system resilience (ISR) sub-indices, as well as the overall resilience index, using 1000 bootstrap replicates. We also explored the internal consistency and scale reliability of the index, by calculating Cronbach alphas for the various proposed capacities and their corresponding attributes. We computed overall resilience to be 48.4 out of a possible 100 in the 47 assessed countries, with generally lower levels of ISR. For ISR, the capacities were weakest for transformation capacity, followed by mobilization of resources, awareness of own capacities, self-regulation and finally diversity of services respectively. This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of empirical evidence on health systems and service resilience, which is of great importance to the functionality and performance of health systems, particularly in the context of COVID-19. It provides a methodological reflection for monitoring health system resilience, revealing areas of improvement in the provision of essential health services during shock events, and builds a case for the need for mechanisms, at country level, that address both specific and non-specific shocks to the health system, ultimately for the attainment of improved health outcomes.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Delivery of Health Care / Disaster Planning / Resilience, Psychological / COVID-19 / Health Resources / Health Services Needs and Demand / Medical Assistance Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0261904

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Delivery of Health Care / Disaster Planning / Resilience, Psychological / COVID-19 / Health Resources / Health Services Needs and Demand / Medical Assistance Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0261904