Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Healthcare professional and professional stakeholders' perspectives on vaccine mandates in Switzerland: A mixed-methods study.
Dietrich, Léna G; Lüthy, Alyssa; Lucas Ramanathan, Pia; Baldesberger, Nadja; Buhl, Andrea; Schmid Thurneysen, Lisa; Hug, Lisa C; Suzanne Suggs, L; Speranza, Camilla; Huber, Benedikt M; Tarr, Philip E; Deml, Michael J.
  • Dietrich LG; University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Lüthy A; University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Lucas Ramanathan P; University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Pharmaceutical Research Care Group, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Baldesberger N; University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Pharmaceutical Research Care Group, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Buhl A; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland.
  • Schmid Thurneysen L; University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Hug LC; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Suzanne Suggs L; Institute of Communication and Public Policy, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Swiss School of Public Health, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Speranza C; Institute of Communication and Public Policy, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Huber BM; Center for Integrative Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Fribourg Hospital HFR, Fribourg, Switzerland; Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  • Tarr PE; University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Deml MJ; Institute of Sociological Research, Department of Sociology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: michael.deml@unige.ch.
Vaccine ; 40(51): 7397-7405, 2022 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1677198
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There currently are no mandatory vaccines in Switzerland. However, Swiss federal legislation allows for vaccination mandates in settings where the risk of transmission to vulnerable groups is high, such as healthcare professionals (HCPs) working with vulnerable patients. Since HCPs are trusted information sources, a priority population for COVID-19 vaccination, and potentially subjected to mandates, we investigated HCP perspectives on mandates.

METHODS:

A national online survey was administered to HCPs (October 2020-March 2021), including vaccine mandates questions concerning patients (measles) and HCPs (influenza). We qualitatively investigated HCP mandate perspectives through (1) 34 interviews with HCPs, HCP professional society representatives, and health authorities; (2) a focus group discussion (FGD) with complementary medicine (CM) and biomedical physicians, and Swiss Federal Vaccination Commission members.

RESULTS:

1933 participants (496 physicians, 226 pharmacists, 607 nurses, 604 midwives) responded to the survey. Quantitative results show all professional groups preferred shared parent-HCP measles vaccine decisions (65%, 54%, 50%, 48%, respectively; p for trend < 0.001). Midwives (87%) and nurses (70%) preferred individual influenza vaccination decisions for HCPs, while physicians (49%) and pharmacists (44%) preferred shared employee-employer decisions (p for trend < 0.001). Physicians (p < .001) and pharmacists (p < .01) with CM training favored individual influenza vaccination decisions. Qualitative results show general HCP opposition to vaccine mandates, mainly because participants argued how other approaches, such as HCP training and better information, could encourage uptake. Arguments against COVID-19 mandates included insufficiently documented long-term safety/efficacy data. From participants' perspectives, mandated vaccination should be used as a last resort. Some participants expressed fear that with mandates, notably for influenza and COVID-19, some HCPs might leave their jobs. HCPs were unsure what vaccine mandates would concretely look like in practice, particularly regarding sanctions for non-compliance and enforcement.

CONCLUSION:

In Switzerland, HCPs generally were opposed to vaccination mandates. Clarity and guidance are needed from health authorities to better inform discussions around vaccine mandates.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Traditional medicine / Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Vaccine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.vaccine.2021.12.071

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Traditional medicine / Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Vaccine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.vaccine.2021.12.071