Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Who is engaging with lateral flow testing for COVID-19 in the UK? The COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses (CORSAIR) study.
Smith, Louise E; Potts, Henry Ww; Amlôt, Richard; Fear, Nicola T; Michie, Susan; Rubin, G James.
  • Smith LE; Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK louise.e.smith@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Potts HW; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, London, UK.
  • Amlôt R; Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
  • Fear NT; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, London, UK.
  • Michie S; UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.
  • Rubin GJ; Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e058060, 2022 02 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1685597
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate uptake of lateral flow testing, reporting of test results and psychological, contextual and socio-demographic factors associated with testing.

DESIGN:

A series of four fortnightly online cross-sectional surveys.

SETTING:

Data collected from 19 April 2021 to 2 June 2021.

PARTICIPANTS:

People living in England and Scotland, aged 18 years or over, excluding those who reported their most recent test was a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test (n=6646, n≈1600 per survey). MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Having completed at least one lateral flow test (LFT) in the last 7 days.

RESULTS:

We used binary logistic regressions to investigate factors associated with having taken at least one LFT. Increased uptake of testing was associated with being vaccinated (adjusted ORs (aORs)=1.52-2.45, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.07, analysed separately by vaccine dose), employed (aOR=1.94, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.32), having been out to work in the last week (aOR=2.30, 95% CI 1.94 to 2.73) and working in a sector that adopted LFT early (aOR=2.54, 95% CI 2.14 to 3.02) . Uptake was higher in people who reported cardinal COVID-19 symptoms in the last week (aOR=1.89, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.66). People who had heard more about LFTs (aOR=2.28, 95% CI 2.06 to 2.51) and knew they were eligible to receive regular LFTs (aOR=2.98, 95% CI 2.35 to 3.78) were also more likely to have tested. Factors associated with not taking a test included agreeing that you do not need to test for COVID-19 unless you have come into contact with a case (aOR=0.51, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS:

Uptake of lateral flow testing is low. Encouraging testing through workplaces and places of study is likely to increase uptake, although care should be taken not to pressurise employees and students. Increasing knowledge that everyone is eligible for regular asymptomatic testing and addressing common misconceptions may drive uptake.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adolescent / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-058060

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adolescent / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-058060