Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Real world data on cardiometabolic diseases in U.S. adults during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a decentralized registry study.
Shah, Parth; Magee, Kim; Buccellato, Kiara H; Ismond, McKenna; Watson, Jalisa.
  • Shah P; ObvioHealth, 3452 Lake Lynda Dr., Bld. 100 Ste 151, Orlando, FL, 32832, USA. parth.shah@obviohealth.com.
  • Magee K; ObvioHealth, 3452 Lake Lynda Dr., Bld. 100 Ste 151, Orlando, FL, 32832, USA.
  • Buccellato KH; ObvioHealth, 3452 Lake Lynda Dr., Bld. 100 Ste 151, Orlando, FL, 32832, USA.
  • Ismond M; ObvioHealth, 3452 Lake Lynda Dr., Bld. 100 Ste 151, Orlando, FL, 32832, USA.
  • Watson J; ObvioHealth, 3452 Lake Lynda Dr., Bld. 100 Ste 151, Orlando, FL, 32832, USA.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 21(1): 24, 2022 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1686015
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pre-existing cardiometabolic comorbidities place SARS-CoV-2 positive patients at a greater risk for poorer clinical course and mortality than those without it. We aimed to analyze real-world registry data focused primarily on participants with cardiometabolic diseases (CMD), which were remotely obtained via a digital platform.

METHODS:

Participants were divided into two groups CMD or no cardiometabolic disease (non-CMD). They were evaluated based on their medical history, current medications/supplements, COVID-19 status, demographics, and baseline characteristics. The frequency of medications/supplements for CMD were compared using relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. The WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (WHO-5) were collected monthly for 6 months to assess psychological well-being which included cheerfulness, calmness, vigor, rest, and engagement with daily activities of interest.

RESULTS:

The 791 enrollees represented 49 U.S. states. The CMD group had significantly higher (p < 0.0001) BMI (mean + 3.04 kg/m2) and age (mean + 9.15 years) compared to non-CMD group. In the CMD group, participants who tested positive for COVID-19 had lower (p < 0.0001) well-being scores than those without COVID-19. For the 274 participants on CMD medications/supplements, there was no statistical difference in risk of COVID-19 contracture based on medication/supplement type; however, all six participants who were not being treated for CMD were COVID-19 positive (RR ~ 104). For 89 participants who were on treatment for diabetes or insulin resistance, there was a 90% reduced risk of COVID-19 incidence (p = 0.0187).

CONCLUSION:

The well-being score of the CMD group was dependent on whether they tested positive for COVID-19. Type of CMD treatment did not impact COVID-19 status, but absence of treatment significantly increased COVID-19 incidence. With respect to SARS-CoV-2, our analysis supports continued use of the statins, ACE-I, ARBs, and diabetes medications in CMD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04348942.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Heart Diseases / Metabolic Diseases Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Journal subject: Vascular Diseases / Cardiology / Endocrinology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12933-022-01462-3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Heart Diseases / Metabolic Diseases Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Journal subject: Vascular Diseases / Cardiology / Endocrinology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12933-022-01462-3