Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Using system dynamics modelling to assess the economic efficiency of innovations in the public sector - a systematic review.
Jadeja, Nidhee; Zhu, Nina J; Lebcir, Reda M; Sassi, Franco; Holmes, Alison; Ahmad, Raheelah.
  • Jadeja N; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Zhu NJ; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Lebcir RM; University of Hertfordshire Business School, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
  • Sassi F; Department of Economics & Public Policy, Centre for Health Economics & Policy Innovation, Imperial College Business School, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.
  • Holmes A; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Ahmad R; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263299, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1686099
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Decision-makers for public policy are increasingly utilising systems approaches such as system dynamics (SD) modelling, which test alternative interventions or policies for their potential impact while accounting for complexity. These approaches, however, have not consistently included an economic efficiency analysis dimension. This systematic review aims to examine how, and in what ways, system dynamics modelling approaches incorporate economic efficiency analyses to inform decision-making on innovations (improvements in products, services, or processes) in the public sector, with a particular interest in health. METHODS AND

FINDINGS:

Relevant studies (n = 29) were identified through a systematic search and screening of four electronic databases and backward citation search, and analysed for key characteristics and themes related to the analytical methods applied. Economic efficiency analysis approaches within SD broadly fell into two categories as embedded sub-models or as cost calculations based on the outputs of the SD model. Embdedded sub-models within a dynamic SD framework can reveal a clear allocation of costs and benefits to periods of time, whereas cost calculations based on the SD model outputs can be useful for high-level resource allocation decisions.

CONCLUSIONS:

This systematic review reveals that SD modelling is not currently used to its full potential to evaluate the technical or allocative efficiency of public sector innovations, particularly in health. The limited reporting on the experience or methodological challenges of applying allocated efficiency analyses with SD, particularly with dynamic embedded models, hampers common learning lessons to draw from and build on. Further application and comprehensive reporting of this approach would be welcome to develop the methodology further.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Policy Type of study: Experimental Studies / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0263299

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Policy Type of study: Experimental Studies / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0263299