Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Development and lessons learned: Year 1 of the national emergency tele-critical care network project
Critical Care Medicine ; 50(1 SUPPL):43, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1692106
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The U.S. healthcare system remains vulnerable to crisis and troubled by resource inequities. Uneven distribution and scarcity of critical care (CC) clinicians is one example COVID19 overwhelmed many hospitals with critically ill patients forcing some clinicians to provide care beyond their normal scope of practice and level of comfort.

METHODS:

The National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network (NETCCN) was developed to address this problem by providing on-demand access to CC experts. NETCCN was funded by the Coronavirus, Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act;as a collaboration between the U.S. Army's Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC), the Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (HHS ASPR), and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). NETCCN focused on rapid development and deployment of technology platforms that were simple and user-friendly, cyber-secure, and HIPAA compliant, and only required a cellular connected mobile device. This federally funded resource allowed local non-CC caregivers to consult with CC experts.

RESULTS:

NETCCN has deployed to six states/territories, eight hospitals and cared for hundreds of patients in locations unfamiliar with managing critically-ill patients. While limited in scope, the NETCCN experience highlights key challenges and successes to address or sustain moving forward. Fear commonly prevented wider acceptance and use of NETCCN support. Clinicians fear judgment when asking questions;hospital administrators fear violating laws or disrupting “normal” practice patterns;and provider groups fear loss of market share. Despite laws that permit expedience during disaster conditions, major policy barriers, particularly local credentialing and privileging processes, hinder the use of tele-CC consultation solutions. Finally, lack of consistent federal, state, and local telehealth policies, especially for in-patient and e-consult services, caused confusion and prevented wider deployment of NETCCN.

CONCLUSIONS:

A federal capability that provides telemedicine support to hospitals or communities in crisis as part of a disaster response system is feasible, but policy barriers and cultural expectations impede rapid adoption.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Language: English Journal: Critical Care Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Language: English Journal: Critical Care Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article