Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Diagnostic accuracy of CO-RADS in patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease-2019: A single center experience.
Guimaraes, Joao Guilherme Boaretto; de Oliveira Salvador, Gabriel Lucca; Papp, Carolina Lobo; Boica, Adrian Sobreiro Leal; Bittencourt, Andressa Borges; Grandi, Isabela Fernanda Rohde; Suckow, Kelvin; Fonseca, Vinicius Ribas.
  • Guimaraes JGB; Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil.
  • de Oliveira Salvador GL; Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil; Federal University of Parana, Department of Radiology, Internal Medicine Branch, R. General Carneiro, 181, Curitiba, PR 80060-900, Brazil. Electronic address: glucca11@gmail.com.
  • Papp CL; Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil.
  • Boica ASL; Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil.
  • Bittencourt AB; Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil; X-Leme Radiology Clinic, Batel Av 1541, Curitiba, Parana 80420-090, Brazil.
  • Grandi IFR; Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil; X-Leme Radiology Clinic, Batel Av 1541, Curitiba, Parana 80420-090, Brazil.
  • Suckow K; Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil.
  • Fonseca VR; Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil.
Clin Imaging ; 86: 7-12, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1693786
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) is a tool for standardizing the reports of patients with suspected or confirmed Sars-CoV-2 infection. We performed a study of the performance of the CO-RADS in a triage scenario of patients in Brazil.

METHODS:

Data from 426 Computed Tomography (CT) scans from March 2020 through December 2020 were assessed in an ambidirectional, both retrospective and prospective, for the assessment in one of the six categories of the CO-RADS. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) Youden's index, Positive and Negative Clinical Utility Index (UC + and UC- respectively) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). We also plotted Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve with Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CO-RADS of >4 (4 + 5).

RESULTS:

For CO-RADS classification > 4 (4 + 5) considered positive, the AUC obtained was of 0.89 (95% CI of 0.02), sensitivity of 78% (95% CI of 0.3), specificity of 91% (95% CI of 0.3), PPV of 0.92 (95% CI of 0.02), NPV of 0.41 (95% CI of 0.03), PLR of 0.85 (95% CI of 0.2), and NLR of 0.23 (95% CI of 0.02).

CONCLUSION:

CO-RADS demonstrated overall good diagnostic performance in stratifying patients with suspected Sars-CoV-2 infection, even those without confirmed laboratorial diagnosis, therefore being useful in a triage scenario with lack of resources.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Imaging Journal subject: Diagnostic Imaging Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.clinimag.2022.02.005

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Imaging Journal subject: Diagnostic Imaging Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.clinimag.2022.02.005