Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Digital habits of pulmonary rehabilitation service-users following the COVID-19 pandemic.
Polgar, Oliver; Patel, Suhani; Walsh, Jessica A; Barker, Ruth E; Ingram, Karen A; Kon, Samantha Sc; Man, William Dc; Nolan, Claire M.
  • Polgar O; Harefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Clinical Group, 8945Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Patel S; Harefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Clinical Group, 8945Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Walsh JA; National Heart and Lung Institute, 4615Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Barker RE; Harefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Clinical Group, 8945Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Ingram KA; Harefield Respiratory Research Group, Royal Brompton and Harefield Clinical Group, 8945Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Kon SS; National Heart and Lung Institute, 4615Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Man WD; 586157Wessex Academic Health Science Network, Southampton, UK.
  • Nolan CM; Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Clinical Group, 8945Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Chron Respir Dis ; 19: 14799731221075647, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1702284
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We previously demonstrated low levels of digital literacy amongst pulmonary rehabilitation service-users prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to identify whether the pandemic accelerated digital literacy in this population, resulting in greater acceptance of remote web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme models.

METHODS:

We surveyed digital access and behaviours and pulmonary rehabilitation delivery preferences of service-users referred to pulmonary rehabilitation in 2021 (cohort 2021) and propensity score-matched them to a cohort who completed the survey in 2020 (cohort 2020).

RESULTS:

There were indicators that digital access and confidence were better amongst the Cohort 2021 but no difference was seen in the proportion of patients choosing remote web-based pulmonary rehabilitation as an acceptable method of receiving pulmonary rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION:

In an unselected cohort of service-users, remote web-based pulmonary rehabilitation was considered acceptable in only a minority of patients which has implications on healthcare commissioning and delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Chron Respir Dis Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 14799731221075647

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Chron Respir Dis Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 14799731221075647