Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Culture and understanding the role of feedback for health professions students: realist synthesis protocol.
Fullerton, Paul Douglas; Sarkar, Mahbub; Haque, Shamsul; McKenzie, Wendy.
  • Fullerton PD; Clinical School Johor Bahru, Monash University Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia paul.fullerton@monash.edu.
  • Sarkar M; Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Haque S; Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • McKenzie W; Department of Psychology, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Science, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e049462, 2022 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1706581
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Clinical education has moved to a 'competency-based' model with an emphasis on workplace-based learning and assessment which, in turn, depends on feedback to be effective. Further, the understanding of feedback has changed from information about a performance directed to the learner performing the task, to a dialogue, which enables the learner to act and develop.In health professional education, feedback is a complex interaction between trainee, supervisor and the healthcare system. Most published research on feedback in health professional education originates in Europe and North America. Our interest is on the impact of Culture on this process, particularly in the context of Asian cultures.The (scientific) realist approach of Pawson and Tilley provides a means to examine complex interventions in social situations, and thus is an appropriate lens to use for this study. This is a protocol for a realist synthesis which asks how, why and in what circumstances do Asian Cultures influence health professional trainees to seek, respond to and use feedback given in the clinical environment, if at all. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

An initial search was performed to help define the scope of the review question and develop our initial programme theory. The formal electronic search was carried out in February 2020 and included CINAHL, ERIC, Medline and PsycInfo, and repeated in October 2020. Retrieved articles were imported into Covidence for screening and data extraction, after which components of the Context-Mechanisms-Outcomes configurations will be sought to refine the initial programme theory. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As this study is a literature review, ethics approval is not required.The findings will be documented in line with the RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses Evolving Standards) publications standards for Realist syntheses, and we plan to disseminate the findings by means of a peer-reviewed journal article and conference presentation(s).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Health Occupations Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-049462

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Health Occupations Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-049462