Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A method comparison of three immunoassays for detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain in individuals with adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccination.
Chen, Hui; Yu, Wanwan; Gao, Xiaojiao; Jiang, Weijun; Li, Xiaojun; Liu, Guorui; Yang, Yang.
  • Chen H; Basic Medical Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Yu W; Emergency Department, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Gao X; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Jiang W; Basic Medical Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Li X; Basic Medical Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Liu G; State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, Department of Chemistry, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  • Yang Y; Basic Medical Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Laboratory Science, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 36(4): e24306, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1707939
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Detecting neutralizing antibodies targeting receptor-binding domain (RBD) is important for the assessment of humoral protection and vaccine efficacy after vaccination. We compared the performance of three surrogate immunoassays for detection of neutralizing antibodies targeting RBD.

METHODS:

We analyzed 115 serum samples obtained from individuals with Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccination using two competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Wantai BioPharm and Synthgene Medical Technology) and one competitive chemiluminescence assay (YHLO Biotech). Performance evaluation and methodology comparison were performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute related guidelines.

RESULTS:

The precision met the manufacturers' statements. The linear range of the WANTAI was 0.0625-0.545 U/ml and the YHLO was 0.260-242.4 U/ml. The WANTAI's limit of blank (LoB) and limit of detection (LoD) were 0.03 and 0.06 U/ml, respectively. The YHLO's LoB and LoD were 0.048 and 0.211 U/ml, respectively. The correlations of semi-quantitative results of Synthgene with quantitative results of YHLO (ρ = 0.566) and WANTAI (ρ = 0.512) were medium. For YHLO and WANTAI, there was a good agreement (0.62) and a strong correlation (ρ = 0.931). Passing-Bablok analysis and Bland-Altman plot showed a positive bias (112.3%) of the YHLO compared to the WANTAI. The exclusion of samples >50 U/ml did not decrease bias.

CONCLUSION:

These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of surrogate viral neutralization assays and provide useful data for future comparison studies.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Journal subject: Laboratory Techniques and procedures Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jcla.24306

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Journal subject: Laboratory Techniques and procedures Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jcla.24306