Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Global disparities in public health guidance for the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy.
Zavala, Eleonor; Krubiner, Carleigh B; Jaffe, Elana F; Nicklin, Andrew; Gur-Arie, Rachel; Wonodi, Chizoba; Faden, Ruth R; Karron, Ruth A.
  • Zavala E; Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA ezavala1@jhu.edu.
  • Krubiner CB; Center for Global Development, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Jaffe EF; Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Nicklin A; School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Gur-Arie R; Centers for Civic Impact, Krieger School of Arts & Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Wonodi C; Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Faden RR; Department of International Health, International Vaccine Access Center at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Karron RA; Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
BMJ Glob Health ; 7(2)2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1714404
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Gaps in information about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy have led to substantial global variation in public health guidance regarding the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy over the course of the pandemic.

METHODS:

We conducted systematic screenings of public health authorities' websites across 224 countries and territories every 3 weeks to track the development of policies on COVID-19 vaccine use in pregnancy. Policies were categorised using a 1-5 permissiveness scale, with 1 indicating policies that recommended use, and 5 indicating policies that recommended against use.

RESULTS:

As of 30 September 2021, 176 countries/territories had issued explicit guidance on COVID-19 vaccine use in pregnancy, with 38% recommending use, 28% permitting use, 15% permitting use with qualifications, 2% not recommending but with exceptions, and 17% not recommending use whatsoever. This represented a significant shift from May 2021, when only 6% of countries/territories with such policies recommended the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy (p<0.001). However, no policy positions could be found for 21% of all countries and territories, the vast majority being low and middle income. Policy positions also varied widely by vaccine product, with Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines being most commonly recommended or permitted.

CONCLUSION:

Our study highlights the evolution of policies regarding COVID-19 vaccine use in pregnancy over a 5-month period in 2021, the role of pregnancy-specific data in shaping these policies and how inequities in access for pregnant people persist, both within countries and globally.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjgh-2021-007730

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjgh-2021-007730