Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review.
Wasmann, Jan-Willem; Pragt, Leontien; Eikelboom, Robert; Swanepoel, De Wet.
  • Wasmann JW; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Pragt L; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Eikelboom R; Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.
  • Swanepoel W; Ear Sciences Centre, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
J Med Internet Res ; 24(2): e32581, 2022 02 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1714906
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hearing loss affects 1 in 5 people worldwide and is estimated to affect 1 in 4 by 2050. Treatment relies on the accurate diagnosis of hearing loss; however, this first step is out of reach for >80% of those affected. Increasingly automated approaches are being developed for self-administered digital hearing assessments without the direct involvement of professionals.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to provide an overview of digital approaches in automated and machine learning assessments of hearing using pure-tone audiometry and to focus on the aspects related to accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency. This review is an extension of a 2013 systematic review.

METHODS:

A search across the electronic databases of PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant reports from the peer-reviewed literature. Key information about each report's scope and details was collected to assess the commonalities among the approaches.

RESULTS:

A total of 56 reports from 2012 to June 2021 were included. From this selection, 27 unique automated approaches were identified. Machine learning approaches require fewer trials than conventional threshold-seeking approaches, and personal digital devices make assessments more affordable and accessible. Validity can be enhanced using digital technologies for quality surveillance, including noise monitoring and detecting inconclusive results.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the past 10 years, an increasing number of automated approaches have reported similar accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency as manual hearing assessments. New developments, including machine learning approaches, offer features, versatility, and cost-effectiveness beyond manual audiometry. Used within identified limitations, automated assessments using digital devices can support task-shifting, self-care, telehealth, and clinical care pathways.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hearing / Hearing Loss Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Med Internet Res Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 32581

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hearing / Hearing Loss Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Med Internet Res Journal subject: Medical Informatics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 32581