Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The effect of COVID-19 outbreak on endourological treatments for urinary stones: A retrospective multicentric study
European Urology ; 81:S387-S388, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1721163
ABSTRACT
Introduction &

Objectives:

The COVID-19 outbreak has brought challenges to the global healthcare community. The management of upper urinary tract stones has been affected even further, with potential severe sequelae for patient’s health.Materials &

Methods:

We report a multicentric retrospective study involving 9 Centers regularly delivering treatment for upper tract urinary stonesacross the country. All Centers suffered significant limitations during the pandemic period due to government limitations. We compared the 12months-period prior to COVID-19 (from march 1st 2019 to February 28th 2020, named as period A) with post-COVID-19 period (from march 1st,2020 to February 28th, 2021 named as period B). Aim of the study was to compare endourological procedures for upper urinary stones duringperiod A and the period B. This study investigated all types of surgeries for stones delivered in both elective and emergency setting.

Results:

A total of 4018 procedures were collected, including 2176 procedures in period A. In period B, 1842 procedures were carried out,corresponding to a loss of 15.35% of cases (p<0.001). Looking into elective cases, 1622 procedures were delivered in period A, compared to 1280in period B, resulting in a loss of 342 cases corresponding to 21.81% (p=0.001). All types of stone treatments resulted affected, including ESWL(from 487 cases in period A to 344 in period B, -29.37%, p=0.001), PCNLs (from 170 to 125 cases, corresponding to -26.47%, p0.008), retrogradesurgery for renal stones (from 433 to 387 cases, -10.63%, p=0.008) and for ureteric stones (from 614 cases to 484, -21.18%, p.008). Additionally,waiting lists resulted affected, with significant delays in period B. In particular, for ureteric stones, mean waiting time in period A was 61.5 dayscompared to 87.5 days in period B (p=0.008). Regarding renal stones, waiting list increased from 64.74 days in period A to 85.66 days in periodB for RIRS. The waiting list for percutaneous surgeries increased from 79 days to 103 days (p.001). We did not find any patient which acquiredCOVID-19 during hospitalization for elective or urgent surgery. We also found a longer waiting list for pre-stented patients, resulting to be 86.5 daysin period B compared to 64 days in period A (p<0.005).

Conclusions:

Our study showed how COVID-19 caused a significant disruption in endourological services across the country. Our data underlined how less patients received treatment in a longer time. This can potentially lead to an increased risk of stone-related complications, including sepsis and kidney loss
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Language: English Journal: European Urology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Language: English Journal: European Urology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article