Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Self-administered, remote assessment of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in health care workers.
Card, Lauren; Litwin, Christine M; Curry, Scott; Mack, Elizabeth H; Nietert, Paul J; Meissner, Eric G.
  • Card L; South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Litwin CM; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Curry S; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Mack EH; Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Nietert PJ; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Meissner EG; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: meissner@musc.edu.
Am J Med Sci ; 364(3): 281-288, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1729516
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Our objective was to safely and remotely assess longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in at-risk health care workers at the onset of the epidemic.

METHODS:

Self-administered serologic testing was performed every 30 days up to 5 times using a point-of-care, lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG immunoassay in a cohort of at-risk health care workers (n = 339) and lower-risk controls (n = 100).

RESULTS:

Subjects were enrolled between 4/14/20-5/6/20 and most were clinicians (41%) or nurses (27%). Of 20 subjects who reported confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to (n = 5, 1%) or during the study (n = 15, 3%), half (10/20) were seropositive. Five additional subjects were seropositive and did not report documented infection. Estimated infection rates in health care workers did not differ from concurrent community rates.

CONCLUSIONS:

This remotely conducted, contact-free study did not identify serologic evidence of widespread occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Med Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.amjms.2022.01.025

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Am J Med Sci Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.amjms.2022.01.025