Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Are Minimum Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Necessary for Accurate Assessment of Patient Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Seetharam, Abhijit; Deckard, Evan R; Ziemba-Davis, Mary; Meneghini, R Michael.
  • Seetharam A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Deckard ER; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Ziemba-Davis M; Indiana University Health Hip and Knee Center at Saxony Hospital, Fishers, IN.
  • Meneghini RM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Indiana University Health Hip and Knee Center at Saxony Hospital, Fishers, IN.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(8S): S716-S720, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1729545
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The two-year minimum follow-up after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) required by most academic journals is based on implant survivorship studies rather than patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic placed an unprecedented burden on patients and staff and halted asymptomatic surveillance clinic visits to minimize exposure. The purpose of this study was to determine if clinically meaningful differences were observed in PROMs beyond one year after TKA.

METHODS:

A retrospective review was performed on prospectively collected PROMs after 1093 primary TKAs at a suburban academic center. PROMs related to pain, function, activity level, and satisfaction were compared by subsequent follow-up intervals preoperatively, at 4 months, 1 year, and minimum 2 years using paired data analysis techniques.

RESULTS:

Pain with level walking and while climbing stairs improved from preoperative levels to 4-month, 1-year, and minimum 2-year follow-up. The University of California Los Angeles activity level and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement improved over the same intervals. Patient satisfaction improved over postoperative follow-up intervals (84.0%, 87.3%, and 90.9%). While PROMs improved with statistical and clinical significance preoperatively to 4-month to 1-year follow-up, improvements from 1-year to minimum 2-year follow-up were small and did not reach minimum clinically important differences for nearly all PROMs, demonstrating significant overlap of the 95% confidence intervals.

CONCLUSION:

While long-term follow-up after TKA remains important for implant survivorship, it appears that one-year PROMs are as clinically reliable and meaningful as two-year PROMs. Therefore, it is reasonable to question the currently accepted 2-year minimum follow-up requirement used in peer-reviewed research involving PROMs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Awards and Prizes / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Osteoarthritis, Knee / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.arth.2022.02.016

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Awards and Prizes / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Osteoarthritis, Knee / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.arth.2022.02.016