Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method as an effective molecular point-of-care technique for the rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Biochimica Clinica ; 45(SUPPL 2):S101, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1733284
ABSTRACT

Background:

The novel Coronavirus disease-2019 (Covid-19) pandemic emergency is a concrete example of the existing gap between availability of advanced diagnostics and need for cost-effective methodology. The current standard method for Coronavirus detection is the reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), but the recent validation of a new rapid SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP assay offers an alternative diagnostic pathway. Unlike PCR tests, LAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) do not require sequential changes of temperature and so can turnaround test results more rapidly. We explored the diagnostic effectiveness of LAMP compared with RTqPCR traditional assay.

Methods:

A sample of 1652 UTM NP swabs (collected from suspected or non suspected patient of ED) were tested for SARS Cov2 infection, using IC GENE SARS-CoV-2 POC (Enbiotech) that detect two specific viral targets S gene and N gene. After a rapid termal RNA extraction protocol, a Real Time amplifier and fluorescence reader allowed us to achieve the result (simultaneously, and up to 12 samples per run) in a time between 30 and 60 minutes. The same samples were further analyzed with a RT-qPCR traditional assay (Cephied Xpert Xpress® SARS cov-2 and Altona RealStar® SARS-cov-2 RT-PCR).

Results:

The technical performance of assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 72.2 % (95%CI 61.4/80.8) and specificity of 86.8 % (95%CI 85.0/88.4), VPP 21.5%, VPN 98.4%, in comparison to current standard of care RT-qPCR testing after RNA extraction, across all samples tested (CT <45 by RTqPCR), increasing to a sensitivity of 96.6 % for those samples with a higher viral load (CT <25 by RTqPCR). Our results shows that main limitation of LAMP is the high number of false positive samples (80% of all positive test).

Conclusions:

in our experience the ICGene RNA RT-LAMP kit only reliably detects very strong positives patients (Ct<25), however, statistically, these are the most infectious cases and so the most urgent to find quickly, particularly in vulnerable settings. Whereby RNA RT-LAMP could replace rRT-PCR where there is need to rapidly identify highly contagious individuals within emergency departments, ensuring results still get laboratory confirmation with highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT).
Keywords
Search on Google
Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Biochimica Clinica Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Biochimica Clinica Year: 2022 Document Type: Article