Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Understanding ethnic inequalities in stillbirth rates: a UK population-based cohort study.
Matthews, Ruth J; Draper, Elizabeth S; Manktelow, Bradley N; Kurinczuk, Jennifer J; Fenton, Alan C; Dunkley-Bent, Jacqueline; Gallimore, Ian; Smith, Lucy K.
  • Matthews RJ; Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK rjm88@le.ac.uk.
  • Draper ES; Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Manktelow BN; Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Kurinczuk JJ; National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
  • Fenton AC; Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Dunkley-Bent J; Chief Midwifery Officer, NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK.
  • Gallimore I; Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Smith LK; Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e057412, 2022 03 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1736072
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate inequalities in stillbirth rates by ethnicity to facilitate development of initiatives to target those at highest risk.

DESIGN:

Population-based perinatal mortality surveillance linked to national birth and death registration (Mothers and Babies Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK).

SETTING:

UK.

PARTICIPANTS:

4 391 569 singleton births at ≥24+0 weeks gestation between 2014 and 2019. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Stillbirth rate difference per 1000 total births by ethnicity.

RESULTS:

Adjusted absolute differences in stillbirth rates were higher for babies of black African (3.83, 95% CI 3.35 to 4.32), black Caribbean (3.60, 95% CI 2.65 to 4.55) and Pakistani (2.99, 95% CI 2.58 to 3.40) ethnicities compared with white ethnicities. Higher proportions of babies of Bangladeshi (42%), black African (39%), other black (39%) and black Caribbean (37%) ethnicities were from most deprived areas, which were associated with an additional risk of 1.50 stillbirths per 1000 births (95% CI 1.32 to 1.67). Exploring primary cause of death, higher stillbirth rates due to congenital anomalies were observed in babies of Pakistani, Bangladeshi and black African ethnicities (range 0.63-1.05 per 1000 births) and more placental causes in black ethnicities (range 1.97 to 2.24 per 1000 births). For the whole population, over 40% of stillbirths were of unknown cause; however, this was particularly high for babies of other Asian (60%), Bangladeshi (58%) and Indian (52%) ethnicities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Stillbirth rates declined in the UK, but substantial excess risk of stillbirth persists among babies of black and Asian ethnicities. The combined disadvantage for black, Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnicities who are more likely to live in most deprived areas is associated with considerably higher rates. Key causes of death were congenital anomalies and placental causes. Improved strategies for investigation of stillbirth causes are needed to reduce unexplained deaths so that interventions can be targeted to reduce stillbirths.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethnicity / Stillbirth Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Infant / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-057412

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethnicity / Stillbirth Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Infant / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-057412