Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Use of oral polio vaccine and the incidence of COVID-19 in the world.
Habibzadeh, Farrokh; Chumakov, Konstantin; Sajadi, Mohammad M; Yadollahie, Mahboobeh; Stafford, Kristen; Simi, Ashraf; Kottilil, Shyamasundaran; Hafizi-Rastani, Iman; Gallo, Robert C.
  • Habibzadeh F; Global Virus Network, Middle East Region, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Chumakov K; Research and Development Headquarters, Petroleum Industry Health Organization, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Sajadi MM; Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Food and Drug Administration, Global Virus Network Center of Excellence, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Yadollahie M; Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Stafford K; Global Virus Network, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Simi A; Freelance Researcher, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Kottilil S; Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Hafizi-Rastani I; Global Virus Network, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Gallo RC; Research and Development Headquarters, Petroleum Industry Health Organization, Shiraz, Iran.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0265562, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1745305
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Several live attenuated vaccines were shown to provide temporary protection against a variety of infectious diseases through stimulation of the host innate immune system.

OBJECTIVE:

To test the hypothesis that countries using oral polio vaccine (OPV) have a lower cumulative number of cases diagnosed with COVID-19 per 100,000 population (CP100K) compared with those using only inactivated polio vaccine (IPV).

METHODS:

In an ecological study, the CP100K was compared between countries using OPV vs IPV. We used a random-effect meta-analysis technique to estimate the pooled mean for CP100K. We also used negative binomial regression with CP100K as the dependent variable and the human development index (HDI) and the type of vaccine used as independent variables.

RESULTS:

The pooled estimated mean CP100K was 4970 (95% CI 4030 to 5900) cases per 100,000 population for countries using IPV, significantly (p<0.001) higher than that for countries using OPV-1580 (1190 to 1960). Countries with higher HDI prefer to use IPV; those with lower HDI commonly use OPV. Both HDI and the type of vaccine were independent predictors of CP100K. Use of OPV compared to IPV could independently decrease the CP100K by an average of 30% at the mean HDI of 0.72.

CONCLUSIONS:

Countries using OPV have a lower incidence of COVID-19 compared to those using IPV. This might suggest that OPV may either prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection at individual level or slow down the transmission at the community level.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral / Global Health / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0265562

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral / Global Health / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0265562