Social Determinants of Health Screening During COVID-19: A Comparison Between an Urban Academic Emergency Department Fast Track and Adult Primary Care Clinic

ABSTRACT

Study Objectives: Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact patients’ health outcomes, yet screening methods in emergency departments (EDs) are inconsistent. Patients who seek care in EDs may be at greater risk for adverse SDOH than those seen by their primary care physician (PCP), but little comparable data is available. The authors sought to identify SDOH among ED Fast Track patients during the COVID-19 pandemic at an urban, safety-net hospital, measure preferred methods of resource referrals and barriers to accessing resources, and compare the prevalence of adverse SDOH among of ED Fast Track patients to that of adult PCP clinic patients. Methods: ED Fast Track patients were screened using a validated SDOH screener, and asked about the impact of COVID-19 on their SDOH. This was a convenience sample conducted from 1/15/21 to 4/13/21 and determined to be exempt by the IRB. Trained study staff completed screening and provided a printed resource guide. A two-week follow-up telephone survey assessed for barriers to resource connection. ED Fast Track patient data was then compared to concurrent SDOH data for adult PCP clinic patients, which collected the same validated SDOH screening data but was self-reported. Results: Among 414 adult ED Fast Track patients, 296 (71.5%) screened positive for at least one adverse SDOH, most commonly education (38.41%), food (35.0%), and housing insecurity (20.5%). Most (56.8%) endorsed COVID-19 affecting their SDOH. Fewer patients (36/156, 23.1%) reported attempting to connect with a resource. Barriers to accessing resources included having no time to call or visit the resource (59%), not recalling being given the resource guide (41%) or having lost it (28%). When compared to adult PCP clinic patients (Table 1), ED Fast Track patients were 10 times more likely to report at least one adverse SDOH (OR 10.0, 95% CI 6.9-14.4), 13 times more likely to report housing needs (OR 13.1, 95% CI 5.2-32.7), 8 times more likely to have food insecurity (OR 8.2, 95% CI 4.7-14.1) and 11 times more likely to have employment difficulty (OR 11.1, 95% CI 5.7-21.6). Conclusion: Most ED Fast Track patients reported at least one adverse SDOH negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Providing printed resource guides at ED discharge may be insufficient for linking patients to resources. ED Fast Track patients were far more likely to report adverse SDOH than adult PCP clinic patients based on the unadjusted odds ratio analyses. This finding, however, is limited by the negative impact of COVID-19 on ambulatory SDOH screening rate, and a potential selection bias as patients with adverse SDOH may have experienced difficulty accessing their PCP clinics. This finding further emphasizes the need to standardize and expand SDOH screening and strengthen further resources from EDs. [Formula presented]