Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Home Aerobic Training for Cerebellar Degenerative Diseases: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Barbuto, Scott; Kuo, Sheng-Han; Winterbottom, Lauren; Lee, Seonjoo; Stern, Yaakov; O'Dell, Michael; Stein, Joel.
  • Barbuto S; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, Harkness Pavilion, 180 Fort Washington, New York, NY, 10032, USA. sb3779@cumc.columbia.edu.
  • Kuo SH; Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Winterbottom L; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, Harkness Pavilion, 180 Fort Washington, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
  • Lee S; Department of Biostatistics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Stern Y; Department of Neurology and Taub Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • O'Dell M; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
  • Stein J; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, Harkness Pavilion, 180 Fort Washington, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Cerebellum ; 2022 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1749936
ABSTRACT
Balance training has shown some benefits in cerebellar ataxia whereas the effects of aerobic training are relatively unknown. To determine whether a phase III trial comparing home aerobic to balance training in ambulatory patients with cerebellar ataxia is warranted, we conducted a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Nineteen subjects were randomized to aerobic training and 17 subjects to balance training. The primary outcome was improvement in ataxia as measured by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Secondary outcomes included safety, training adherence, and balance improvements. There were no differences between groups at baseline. Thirty-one participants completed the trial, and there were no training-related serious adverse events. Compliance to training was over 70%. There was a mean improvement in ataxia symptoms of 1.9 SARA points (SD 1.62) in the aerobic group compared to an improvement of 0.6 points (SD 1.34) in the balance group. Although two measures of balance were equivocal between groups, one measure of balance showed greater improvement with balance training compared to aerobic training. In conclusion, this 6-month trial comparing home aerobic versus balance training in cerebellar ataxia had excellent retention and adherence to training. There were no serious adverse events, and training was not interrupted by minor adverse events like falls or back pain. There was a significant improvement in ataxia symptoms with home aerobic training compared to balance training, and a phase III trial is warranted. Clinical trial registration number NCT03701776 on October 8, 2018.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal subject: Brain Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12311-022-01394-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal subject: Brain Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12311-022-01394-4