Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situations of Uncertainty
Argumentation Library
; 43:85-103, 2022.
Article
in English
| Scopus | ID: covidwho-1750497
ABSTRACT
Arguably, one of the defining traits of an expert is certainty of knowledge. So, what happens when experts in a critical situation in public simultaneously must recognize uncertainty about knowledge and the situation and argue for specific policies and actions? This has been the challenge for many national health experts during the COVID-19 crisis. We examine such argumentative strategies by asking what are the argumentative strategies used when attempting to secure and bolster the ethos of expertise when an expert must also acknowledge uncertainty and insufficient knowledge? The chapter examines such argumentative strategies by health authorities participating in debate and interview programs. Contrary to previous research our findings indicate that the health experts do acknowledge uncertainty, often explicitly, and also do it as a way of bolstering their ethos. Firstly, our analyses point to two ways of introducing and expressing uncertainty and lack of knowledge. Secondly, our analyses point to six ways of delimiting and qualifying the expressed uncertainty in a way that rebolsters the expert’s authority and ethos of expertise. © 2022, The Author(s).
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Databases of international organizations
Database:
Scopus
Language:
English
Journal:
Argumentation Library
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS