Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Hospital clinicians' psychosocial well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal study.
Wynter, Karen; Holton, Sara; Trueman, Melody; Bruce, Suellen; Sweeney, Sue; Crowe, Shane; Dabscheck, Adrian; Eleftheriou, Paul; Booth, Sarah; Hitch, Danielle; Said, Catherine M; Haines, Kimberley J; Rasmussen, Bodil.
  • Wynter K; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, 3220, Australia.
  • Holton S; The Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Western Health Partnership, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Trueman M; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, 3220, Australia.
  • Bruce S; The Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Western Health Partnership, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Sweeney S; Nursing and Midwifery, Western Health, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Crowe S; People, Culture and Communications, Western Health, Footscray, 3021, Australia.
  • Dabscheck A; Nursing and Midwifery, Western Health, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Eleftheriou P; Nursing and Midwifery, Western Health, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Booth S; Medical Services, Western Health, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Hitch D; Medical Services, Western Health, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Said CM; Allied Health, Western Health, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Haines KJ; Allied Health, Western Health, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
  • Rasmussen B; Allied Health, Western Health, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 72(3): 215-224, 2022 04 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1752147
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hospital clinicians report poor psychosocial well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Few studies have reported data at more than one time point.

AIMS:

To compare psychosocial well-being among hospital clinicians at two different time points during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

METHODS:

Participants included doctors, nurses, midwives and allied health clinicians at a multi-site, public health service in Melbourne, Australia. Data were collected via two cross-sectional, online surveys May to June (wave 1; n = 638) and October to December 2020 (wave 2; n = 358). The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) assessed psychological well-being in the past week. Investigator-devised questions assessed COVID-19 concerns and perceived work impacts. General linear models were used to assess impact of wave on psychological distress.

RESULTS:

There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Both positive (e.g. learning experience) and negative (e.g. risk of getting COVID-19) impacts were reported. In both waves, staff were most concerned about health risks to family members. Wave 2 respondents were significantly more likely than wave 1 respondents to indicate concerns about colleagues having COVID-19, increased workloads, leave cancellation and increased conflict at work (all P < 0.001). Adjusting for sex, age, self-rated health and discipline group, depression, anxiety and stress scores were significantly higher for respondents in the second than the first wave (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Psychological well-being of hospital clinicians was significantly worse during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic than the first. Sustained occupational and psychosocial support is recommended even when immediate COVID-19 concerns and impacts resolve.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Journal subject: Occupational Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Occmed

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Journal subject: Occupational Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Occmed