Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of workplace smoke-free policy on secondhand smoke exposure from cigarettes and exposure to secondhand heated tobacco product aerosol during COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: the JACSIS 2020 study.
Takenobu, Koichiro; Yoshida, Satomi; Katanoda, Kota; Kawakami, Koji; Tabuchi, Takahiro.
  • Takenobu K; Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Yoshida S; Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan yoshida.satomi.4r@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
  • Katanoda K; Division of Cancer Statistics Integration, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center Japan, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Kawakami K; Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Tabuchi T; Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e056891, 2022 03 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1752882
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Promoting smoke-free policies is a key intervention for reducing secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. During the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, many indoor smoking spaces in workplaces were closed. This study aimed to reveal the association between a workplace smoke-free policy and SHS exposure among non-smoking employees, distinguishing between SHS exposure from cigarettes and exposure to secondhand heated tobacco product (HTP) aerosol, which have recently become popular in Japan. DESIGN AND

SETTING:

We used data from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey conducted in August-September 2020.

PARTICIPANTS:

Among the 25 482 eligible respondents, 8196 non-smoking employees were analysed. PRIMARY OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the impact of smoke-free policies in the workplace.

RESULTS:

Compared with complete smoking bans, the ORs and 95% CIs for workplace SHS exposure at least once a week from cigarettes were 2.06 (95% CI 1.60 to 2.65) for partial bans with no longer available smoking spaces, 1.92 (95% CI 1.63 to 2.25) for partial smoking bans with still available smoking spaces and 5.33 (95% CI 4.10 to 6.93) for no smoking bans. The corresponding ORs and 95% CIs for exposure to secondhand HTP aerosol were 4.15 (95% CI 3.22 to 5.34), 2.24 (95% CI 1.86 to 2.71) and 3.88 (95% CI 2.86 to 5.26), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The effect of partial bans was limited, and temporary closure of smoking spaces might contribute to increased exposure to secondhand HTP aerosol. Complete smoking bans in the workplace were reaffirmed to be the best way to reduce SHS exposure from cigarettes and exposure to secondhand HTP aerosol.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Smoke-Free Policy / Tobacco Products / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-056891

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Smoke-Free Policy / Tobacco Products / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-056891