Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Rapid antigen test during a COVID-19 outbreak in a private hospital in Hong Kong.
Zee, J S T; Chan, C T L; Leung, A C P; Yu, B P W; Hung, J R L; Chan, Q W L; Ma, E S K; Lee, K H; Lau, C C; Yung, R W H.
  • Zee JST; Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Chan CTL; Infection Control Team, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Leung ACP; Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Yu BPW; Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Hung JRL; Infection Control Team, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Chan QWL; Infection Control Team, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Ma ESK; Infection Control Team, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Lee KH; Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Lau CC; Hospital Administration, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Yung RWH; Hospital Administration, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Med J ; 28(4): 300-305, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1753980
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In response to two nosocomial clusters of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in our hospital, we adopted a series of strict infection control measures, including regular rapid antigen test (RAT) screening for high-risk patients, visitors, and healthcare workers. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a locally developed RAT, the INDICAID COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test (Phase Scientific, Hong Kong), using respiratory samples from both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

METHODS:

Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR)-confirmed deep throat saliva (DTS) and pooled nasopharyngeal swab and throat swab (NPS/TS) samples collected from 1 November to 30 November 2020 were tested by INDICAID. Screening RATs were performed on asymptomatic healthcare workers during a 16-week period (1 December 2020 to 22 March 2021).

RESULTS:

In total, 20 rRT-PCR-confirmed samples (16 DTS, four pooled NPS/TS) were available for RAT. Using the original sample, RAT results were positive in 17/20 samples, indicating 85% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]=62.11%-96.79%). Negative RAT results were associated with higher cycle threshold (Ct) values. For samples with Ct values <25, the sensitivity was 100%. Of the 49 801 RATs collected from healthcare workers, 33 false positives and one rRT-PCR-confirmed case were detected. The overall specificity was 99.93% (95% CI=99.91%-99.95%). The positive and negative predictive values were 2.94% (95% CI=2.11%-4.09%) and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The INDICAID COVID-19 RAT demonstrated good sensitivity for specimens with high viral loads and satisfactory specificity for low-risk, asymptomatic healthcare workers.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Hong Kong Med J Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Hkmj219559

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Hong Kong Med J Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Hkmj219559