Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on a tertiary referral proctology center: no one should be left behind.
Giani, Iacopo; Gallo, Gaetano; Grossi, Ugo; Tanda, Cinzia; Linari, Chiara; Elbetti, Claudio.
  • Giani I; Section of Proctology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy.
  • Gallo G; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Grossi U; IV Surgery Unit, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy - ugo.grossi@aulss2.veneto.it.
  • Tanda C; Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Linari C; Section of Proctology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy.
  • Elbetti C; Section of Proctology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy.
Minerva Surg ; 77(1): 30-34, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1754139
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted healthcare delivery. We aimed to describe a novel strategy to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on a tertiary referral proctology center during the first wave of infection in Italy.

METHODS:

All patients booked appointments at the Proctology Unit between March 9th and May 4th, 2020 were identified. Patients booked for a first visit underwent a structured remote consultation. Patients with perianal or sacrococcygeal abscesses, major anorectal bleeding, incoercible anal pain and red flags for malignancy were labelled as "non-deferrable." A flowchart was designed to comply with adequate assistance of proctologic patients. Demographics, clinical data and outcomes of in-office procedures were collected.

RESULTS:

On a total of 548 booked visits, 198 (36.1%) were cancelled before remote consultation. Of the remaining 350, 112 (32.0%) attended a follow-up visit. Among 238 (68.0%) patients undergoing remote consultation, 88 (25.1%) were deemed "deferrable" and 148 (42.3%) "non-deferrable." Two (0.6%) were hospitalized for COVID-19 while waiting for an outpatient visit. Twenty-five of 88 (28.4%) deferrable patients cancelled their appointment as felt no longer necessary. A total of 45 of 148 (30.4%) non deferrable patients (mean age, 46 years; 31% females) underwent in-office procedures, most often related to anal abscess and/or fistula (48.9%). Final diagnosis of malignancy occurred in four cases. A 55% increase in the number of in-office procedures was noted compared to the previous year. None of the attending patients nor staff members resulted COVID-19 positive during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite the uncertainties accompanying the use of remote consultations in proctology, the results of this study may inform the development of strategies for restructuring activities in response to future emergencies of this magnitude.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Surgery / Remote Consultation / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Minerva Surg Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S2724-5691.21.08897-3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Surgery / Remote Consultation / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Minerva Surg Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S2724-5691.21.08897-3