Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Safety and Efficacy of the Off-Label Use of Pipeline Embolization Device Based on the 2018 Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
Enriquez-Marulanda, Alejandro; Penumaka, Anirudh; Ogilvy, Christopher S; Thomas, Ajith J; Moore, Justin M.
  • Enriquez-Marulanda A; Neurosurgery Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Neurosurgery ; 90(6): 700-707, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1759804
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The pipeline embolization device (PED; ev3/Covidien) has proven safe and effective for treating selected intracranial aneurysms. This device's versatility and popularity have driven increased interest in expanding the latest 2018 Food and Drug Administration-approved indications.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare "off-label" and "on-label" PED treatment.

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with PED at a single center from 2013 to 2019. Comparisons were made based on the 2018 Food and Drug Administration-approved indications.

RESULTS:

A total of 492 treated aneurysms were included (65.2% on-label and 34.8% off-label). Aneurysm complete and near-complete occlusion rate was nonsignificantly lower in the off-label group (80.9% vs 85.7%; P = .19). Off-label treatment had higher rate of poor functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] >2 10.3% vs 3.5%; P = .002). Although pretreatment mRS was already higher in the off-label group (5.3% vs 0.3%; P < .001) and there were no differences in mRS worsening during follow-up (5.5% vs 2.9%; P = .15). We also found a trend to a higher rate of intracranial hemorrhagic complications in the off-label group (4.7% vs 1.6%; P = .05), but there were no differences in hemorrhages requiring surgical intervention (1.8% vs 1.3%; P = .65). There were no differences in retreatment, thromboembolic complications, and mortality rates.

CONCLUSION:

Off-label PED treatment may be considered for select aneurysms, which are challenging to treat with other techniques. These cases have similar complete and near-complete occlusion rates compared with on-label cases. There are, however, higher risks of poor functional outcomes despite similar rates of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. This is partly explained by the significantly higher pretreatment mRS score in the off-label group.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thromboembolism / Intracranial Aneurysm / Embolization, Therapeutic Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Neurosurgery Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Neu.0000000000001891

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thromboembolism / Intracranial Aneurysm / Embolization, Therapeutic Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Neurosurgery Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Neu.0000000000001891