Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effects of face masks and ventilation on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 respiratory transmission in public toilets: a quantitative microbial risk assessment.
Denpetkul, Thammanitchpol; Pumkaew, Monchai; Sittipunsakda, Oranoot; Leaungwutiwong, Pornsawan; Mongkolsuk, Skorn; Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee.
  • Denpetkul T; Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
  • Pumkaew M; Environmental Engineering and Disaster Management Program, School of Multidisciplinary, Mahidol University, Kanchanaburi Campus, Sai Yok, Kanchanaburi 71150, Thailand.
  • Sittipunsakda O; Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
  • Leaungwutiwong P; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand 10400.
  • Mongkolsuk S; Research Laboratory of Biotechnology, Chulabhorn Research Institute, Bangkok 10210, Thailand E-mail: kwanrawee@cri.or.th; Center of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology (EHT), OPS, MHESI, Thailand.
  • Sirikanchana K; Research Laboratory of Biotechnology, Chulabhorn Research Institute, Bangkok 10210, Thailand E-mail: kwanrawee@cri.or.th; Center of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology (EHT), OPS, MHESI, Thailand.
J Water Health ; 20(2): 300-313, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1760069
ABSTRACT
Public toilets may increase the risk of COVID-19 infection via airborne transmission; however, related research is limited. We aimed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 infection risk through respiratory transmission using a quantitative microbial risk assessment framework by retrieving SARS-CoV-2 concentrations from the swab tests of 251 Thai patients. Three virus-generating scenarios were investigated an infector breathing, breathing with a cough, and breathing with a sneeze. The infection risk (95th percentile) was as high as 10-1 with breathing and increased to 1 with a cough or a sneeze. No significant gender differences for toilet users (receptors) were noted. The highest risk scenario, namely breathing with a sneeze, was further evaluated for risk mitigation measures. Mitigation to a lower risk under 10-3 succeeded only when the infector and the receptor both wore N95 respirators or surgical masks. Ventilation of up to 20 air changes per hour (ACH) did not decrease the risk. However, an extended waiting time of 10 min between an infector and a receptor resulted in approximately 1.0-log10 further risk reduction when both wore masks with the WHO-recommended 12 ACH. The volume of expelled droplets, virus concentrations, and receptor dwell time were identified as the main contributors to transmission risk.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: J Water Health Journal subject: Environmental Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: WH.2022.190

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Masks Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: J Water Health Journal subject: Environmental Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: WH.2022.190