Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A Population Study on COVID-19 Information Sharing: Sociodemographic Differences and Associations with Family Communication Quality and Well-Being in Hong Kong.
Sit, Shirley Man-Man; Gong, Wei-Jie; Ho, Sai-Yin; Lai, Agnes Yuen-Kwan; Wong, Bonny Yee-Man; Wang, Man-Ping; Lam, Tai-Hing.
  • Sit SM; School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Gong WJ; School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Ho SY; School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lai AY; School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Wong BY; School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Wang MP; School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lam TH; School of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(6)2022 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1760589
ABSTRACT
Family support through the sharing of information helps to shape and regulate the health and behaviours of family members, but little is known about how families are sharing COVID-19-related information, or about its associations with family communication quality and well-being. We examined the associations of COVID-19 information sharing methods with sociodemographic characteristics, the perceived benefits of information communication and technology (ICT) methods, and family communication quality and well-being in Hong Kong. Of 4852 respondents (53.2% female, 41.1% aged over 55 years), the most common sharing method was instant messaging (82.3%), followed by face-to-face communication (65.7%), phone (25.5%) and social media (15.8%). Female sex (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 1.09), older age (aPRs 1.14-1.22) and higher household income (aPR 1.06) (all p ≤ 0.04) were associated with instant messaging use, while post-secondary education was associated with face-to-face (aPR 1.10), video call (aPR 1.79), and email (aPR 2.76) communications (all p ≤ 0.03). Each ICT sharing method used was associated with a higher likelihood of both reported benefits (aPRs 1.26 and 1.52), better family communication quality and family well-being (adjusted ßs 0.43 and 0.30) (all p ≤ 0.001). We have first shown that COVID-19 information sharing in families using both traditional methods and ICTs, and using more types of methods, was associated with perceived benefits and better family communication quality and well-being amidst the pandemic. Sociodemographic differences in COVID-19 information sharing using ICTs were observed. Digital training may help enhance social connections and promote family well-being.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Media / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph19063577

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Media / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph19063577