Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Continuous hydroxychloroquine or colchicine therapy does not prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2: Insights from a large healthcare database analysis.
Gendelman, Omer; Amital, Howard; Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi; Watad, Abdulla; Chodick, Gabriel.
  • Gendelman O; Department of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Amital H; Department of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: howard.amital@sheba.health.gov.il.
  • Bragazzi NL; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
  • Watad A; Department of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Chodick G; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Maccabitech, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Autoimmun Rev ; 19(7): 102566, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-176093
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Some disease-modifying agents commonly used to treat patients with rheumatic diseases/autoimmune disorders, such as hydroxychloroquine and colchicine, are under investigation as potential therapies for the "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19). However, the role of such agents as prophylactic tools is still not clear.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective study based on a large healthcare computerized database including all patients that were screened for the "Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus type 2" (SARS-CoV-2) in the study period from February 23rd 2020 to March 31st 2020. A comparison was conducted between subjects tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and those found negative in terms of rate of administration of hydroxychloroquine/colchicine therapy.

RESULTS:

An overall sample of 14,520 subjects were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection and 1317 resulted positive. No significant difference was found in terms of rates of usage of hydroxychloroquine or colchicine between those who were found positive for SARS-CoV-2 and those who were found negative (0.23% versus 0.25% for hydroxychloroquine, and 0.53% versus 0.48% for colchicine, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

These findings raise doubts regarding the protective role of these medications in the battle against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Colchicine / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics / Hydroxychloroquine Type of study: Observational study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Autoimmun Rev Journal subject: Allergy and Immunology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.autrev.2020.102566

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia, Viral / Colchicine / Coronavirus Infections / Pandemics / Hydroxychloroquine Type of study: Observational study Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Autoimmun Rev Journal subject: Allergy and Immunology Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.autrev.2020.102566