Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Masking by health care and public safety workers in non-patient care areas to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review.
Patterson, P Daniel; Mcilvaine, Quentin S; Nong, Lily; Liszka, Mary K; Miller, Rebekah S; Guyette, Francis X; Martin-Gill, Christian.
  • Patterson PD; School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
  • Mcilvaine QS; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Emergency Medicine Program University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
  • Nong L; School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
  • Liszka MK; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Emergency Medicine Program University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
  • Miller RS; School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
  • Guyette FX; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Emergency Medicine Program University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
  • Martin-Gill C; School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 3(2): e12699, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1763224
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Wearing a mask is an important method for reducing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission in health care and public safety settings. We assess the evidence regarding masking in the workplace during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic (PROSPERO CRD4202432097).

Methods:

We performed a systematic review of published literature from 4 databases and evaluated the quality of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. We searched for observational and experimental research involving public safety and health care workers. We included articles evaluating the use of masks, versus no mask, on the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results:

Our search yielded 15,013 records, of which 9 studies were included. Most studies (n = 8; 88.9%) involved infections or outbreaks among health care workers. The majority (88.9%) used in-depth interviews of cases and non-cases to obtain self-reported use of masks during periods of exposure. One of 9 studies quantitatively assessed differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection based on use of masks in non-patient care settings. Use of observational study designs, small sample sizes, inadequate control for confounding, and inadequate measurement of exposure and non-exposure periods with infected coworkers contributed to the quality of evidence being judged as very low.

Conclusions:

The available evidence from the initial months of the pandemic suggests that the use of masks in congregate, non-patient care settings, such as breakrooms, helps to reduce risk of SARS-CoV-2 virus transmission. However, this evidence is limited and is of very low quality. Prospective studies incorporating active observation measures are warranted.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article