Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Compliance with venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis guidelines in non-operative traumatic brain injury.
Lara-Reyna, Jacques; Alali, Lea; Wedderburn, Raymond; Margetis, Konstantinos.
  • Lara-Reyna J; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Mount Sinai Morningside/ Mount Sinai West, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jacques.lara.r@gmail.com.
  • Alali L; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA; Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC, USA.
  • Wedderburn R; Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Mount Sinai Morningside/ Mount Sinai West, New York, NY, USA.
  • Margetis K; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 215: 107212, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1763637
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the level of compliance of The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) for initiation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after non-operative traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the explanation for the deviations.

METHODS:

A retrospective review from May 2018 to February 2020 in a Level II trauma center for patients with TBI and length of stay of more than 24 h. We performed an analysis of overall and subgroup compliance with guidelines. The ACS TQIP criteria for low and moderate-risk for hemorrhagic progression were used for subgroup classification.

RESULTS:

Of 393 patients, 239 (60.8%) patients received chemoprophylaxis in a mean of 64 (SD +/-42) hours since admission. "Compliance" was achieved in 52.2% of patients. In subgroup analysis, 51.4% of patients in "low-risk" and 55.1% in "moderate-risk" were "compliant." The most common rationale for non-compliance in "low-risk" was a stay less than 48 h in 35.9% of patients. However, in "moderate-risk," the most common non-compliance was starting prophylaxis before the recommended 72 h from admission in 37% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

Guidelines streamline clinical practice to optimize outcomes, but there are scenarios in which deviation of the recommendations may be indicated based on clinical judgment. We show that a stay of less than 48 h was the most common rationale for not starting prophylaxis in "low-risk" patients. However, in the "moderate-risk" subgroup, the most common reason was starting chemoprophylaxis before the recommended time frame, which we called a "paradoxical" non-compliance.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Venous Thromboembolism / Brain Injuries, Traumatic Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Venous Thromboembolism / Brain Injuries, Traumatic Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Year: 2022 Document Type: Article