Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Rates of Acute Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Mefford, Matthew T; An, Jaejin; Gupta, Nigel; Harrison, Teresa N; Jacobsen, Steven J; Lee, Ming-Sum; Muntner, Paul; Nkonde-Price, Chileshe; Qian, Lei; Reynolds, Kristi.
  • Mefford MT; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
  • An J; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
  • Gupta N; Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA.
  • Harrison TN; Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Jacobsen SJ; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
  • Lee MS; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
  • Muntner P; Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA.
  • Nkonde-Price C; Department of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Qian L; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
  • Reynolds K; Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Perm J ; 252021 12 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1766162
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

During the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic pandemic, stay-at-home orders and fear of acquiring COVID-19 may have led to an avoidance of care for medical emergencies, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated whether a decline in rates of AMI occurred during the COVID-19 stay-at-home order.

METHODS:

Rates of AMI per 100,000 member-weeks were calculated for Kaiser Permanente Southern California patients from January 1 to March 3, 2020 (prepandemic period) and from March 20 to July 31, 2020 (pandemic period), and during the same periods in 2019. Rate ratios (RRs) were calculated comparing the time periods using Poisson regression. Case fatality rates (CFRs) were also compared.

RESULTS:

Rates of AMI were lower during the pandemic period of 2020 compared to the same period of 2019 [3.20 vs 3.76/100,000 member-weeks; RR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.90]. There was no evidence that rates of AMI differed during the 2020 prepandemic period compared to the same period in 2019 (4.45 vs 4.24/100,000 member-weeks; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88-1.03). AMI rates were lower during the early pandemic period (March 20-May 7 RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.77), but not during the later pandemic period (May 8-July 31 RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88-1.02) compared to 2019. In-hospital and 30-day case fatality rates were higher during the pandemic period of 2020 compared to 2019 (8.8% vs 6.1% and 6.5% vs 5.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

AMI rates were lower during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period in 2019. During stay-at-home orders, public health campaigns that encourage people to seek care for medical emergencies are warranted.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Myocardial Infarction Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: TPP

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Myocardial Infarction Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: TPP