Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis.
Zhang, Ye; Wang, Lei; Fang, Zhi-Xian; Chen, Jing; Zheng, Jia-Lian; Yao, Ming; Chen, Wen-Yu.
  • Zhang Y; Department of General Practice, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Wang L; Department of General Practice, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Fang ZX; Department of Respiration, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Chen J; Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Zheng JL; Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Yao M; Department of Pain Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Chen WY; Department of Respiration, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China. 00135116@zjxu.edu.cn.
World J Clin Cases ; 10(8): 2457-2467, 2022 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1771817
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a worldwide pandemic and significant public health issue. The effectiveness of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in treating COVID-19 patients has been called into question.

AIM:

To conduct a meta-analysis on the mortality of COVID-19 patients who require ECMO.

METHODS:

This analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes 2020 (PRISMA) and has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number CRD42020227414). A quality assessment for all the included articles was performed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Studies with tenor more COVID-19 patients undergoing ECMO were included. The random-effects model was used to obtain the pooled incidence of mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO. The source of heterogeneity was investigated using subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS:

We identified 18 articles with 1494 COVID-19 patients who were receiving ECMO. The score of the quality assessment ranged from 5 to 8 on the NOS. The majority of patients received veno-venous ECMO (93.7%). Overall mortality was estimated to be 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.39; I 2 = 84.8%] based on random-effect pooled estimates. There were significant differences in mortality between location groups (33.0% vs 55.0% vs 37.0% vs 18.0%, P < 0.001), setting groups (28.0% vs 34.0%, P < 0.001), sample size (37.0% vs 31.0%, P < 0.001), and NOS groups (39.0% vs 19.0%, P < 0.001). However, both subgroup analyses based on location, setting, and sample size, and sensitivity analysis failed to identify the source of heterogeneity. The funnel plot indicated no evident asymmetry, and the Egger's (P = 0.95) and Begg's (P = 0.14) tests also revealed no significant publication bias.

CONCLUSION:

With more resource assessment and risk-benefit analysis, our data reveal that ECMO might be a feasible and effective treatment for COVID-19 patients.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: World J Clin Cases Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wjcc.v10.i8.2457

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: World J Clin Cases Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Wjcc.v10.i8.2457