Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis.
Li, Yongkai; Xiaojing, He; Zhuanyun, Li; Li, Dandan; Yang, Jianzhong.
  • Li Y; Emergency Trauma Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
  • Xiaojing H; Seven Section of Department of Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Zhuanyun L; Emergency Trauma Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
  • Li D; Emergency Trauma Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
  • Yang J; Emergency Trauma Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(7): e28880, 2022 Feb 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1774439
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is still a lack of large-scale clinical studies and evidence-based evidence to prove the relationship between serum amyloid A (SAA) and the severity and prognosis of patients with new coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19).

METHODS:

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica Database, and Web of Science for original articles from December 1, 2019 to December 19, 2020. Search criteria include free text search, explosive MESH/EMTREE terms, and all synonyms for SAA and COVID-19. There are no language restrictions on the searched documents. Statistical methods were performed using Stata 14.0 software, and RevMan 5.4 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration for meta-analysis. The 10 included studies in the literature were classified according to the severity of the novel coronavirus treatment guidelines, with mild/moderate categorized as nonsevere and severe/critical as severe, and the data were meta-analyzed using multiple subgroup standard deviations combined. Severe and nonsevere were finally divided into 2 groups, and the combined data were meta-analyzed according to the standardized mean difference.

RESULTS:

The results of the meta-analysis given by random effects showed that SAA levels were significantly higher in severe vs nonsevere (standardized mean difference 1.20 [95% confidence interval 0.91-1.48]), which was statistically significant (P < .001). The 3 literatures studied (random effect size 0.11 [95% confidence interval 0.05-0.19]; I2 = 56.68%) and were statistically significant, z = 5.46 P < .01, suggesting that the risk of death occurs at higher levels with increasing SAA values, with the risk of death in the severe group being 11% higher than in the nonsevere group.

CONCLUSION:

SAA can be considered as a biomarker for predicting the severity and prognosis of COVID-19. SAA can be used for early warning of the poor prognosis of COVID-19 and for monitoring the recovery process, which has important clinical value.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Serum Amyloid A Protein / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Md.0000000000028880

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Serum Amyloid A Protein / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Md.0000000000028880