Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Quality of clinical practice guidelines for inadequate response to first-line treatment for depression according to AGREE II checklist and comparison of recommendations: a systematic review.
Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro; Stein, Airton Tetelbom; de Melo, Daniela Oliveira; Henrique Fontes-Mota, Géssica Caroline; Dos Santos, Itamires Benício; de Oliveira, Aliandra Fantinell; Fráguas, Renério; Ribeiro, Eliane.
  • Gabriel FC; Departamento de Farmácia, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil francordegabriel@gmail.com.
  • Stein AT; Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
  • de Melo DO; Curso de Pós-graduação em Avaliação de Tecnologia em Saúde, Hospital Conceição, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
  • Henrique Fontes-Mota GC; Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Instituto de Ciências Ambientais, Químicas e Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Dos Santos IB; Departamento de Farmácia, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • de Oliveira AF; Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Instituto de Ciências Ambientais, Químicas e Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Fráguas R; Departamento de Desenho Industrial, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
  • Ribeiro E; Laboratório de Neuro-imagem em Psiquiatria - LIM-21, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo; Divisão de Psiquiatria e Psicologia, Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e051918, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1774952
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess similarities and differences in the recommended sequence of strategies among the most relevant clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of depression in adults with inadequate response to first-line treatment. DATA SOURCES We performed a systematic review of the literature spanning January 2011 to August 2020 in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and 12 databases recognised as CPGs repositories. CPGs quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II). STUDY SELECTION The eligibility criteria were CPGs that described pharmacological recommendations for treating depression for individuals aged 18 years or older in outpatient care setting. We included CPGs considered of high-quality (≥80% in domain 3 of AGREE II) or recognised as clinically relevant. DATA EXTRACTION Two independent researchers extracted recommendations for patients who did not respond to first-line pharmacological treatment from the selected CPGs.

RESULTS:

We included 46 CPGs and selected 8, of which 5 were considered high quality (≥80% in domain 3 of AGREE II) and 3 were recognised as clinically relevant. Three CPGs did not define inadequate response to treatment and 3 did not establish a clear sequence of strategies. The duration of treatment needed to determine that a patient had not responded was not explicit in 3 CPGs and was discordant in 5 CPGs. Most CPGs agree in reassessing the diagnosis, assessing the presence of comorbidities, adherence to treatment, and increase dosage as first steps. All CPGs recommend psychotherapy, switching antidepressants, and considering augmentation/combining antidepressants.

CONCLUSION:

Relevant CPGs present shortcomings in recommendations for non-responders to first-line antidepressant treatment including absence and divergencies in definition of inadequate response and sequence of recommended strategies. Overall, most relevant CPGs recommend reassessing the diagnosis, evaluate comorbidities, adherence to treatment, increase dosage of antidepressants, and psychotherapy as first steps. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42016043364.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Depression / Checklist Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-051918

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Depression / Checklist Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-051918