Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Working from home in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional results from the Employees Working From Home (EWFH) study.
Oakman, Jodi; Kinsman, Natasha; Lambert, Katrina; Stuckey, Rwth; Graham, Melissa; Weale, Victoria.
  • Oakman J; Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia J.Oakman@latrobe.edu.au.
  • Kinsman N; Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lambert K; School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Stuckey R; Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Graham M; School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Weale V; Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e052733, 2022 04 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1774953
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the impacts, on mental and physical health, of a mandatory shift to working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN:

Cross sectional, online survey.

SETTING:

Online survey was conducted from September 2020 to November 2020 in the general population.

PARTICIPANTS:

Australian residents working from home for at least 2 days a week at some time in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Demographics, caring responsibilities, working from home arrangements, work-related technology, work-family interface, psychosocial and physical working conditions, and reported stress and musculoskeletal pain.

RESULTS:

924 Australians responded to the online questionnaire. Respondents were mostly women (75.5%) based in Victoria (83.7%) and employed in the education and training and healthcare sectors. Approximately 70% of respondents worked five or more days from home, with only 60% having a dedicated workstation in an uninterrupted space. Over 70% of all respondents reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain or discomfort. Gendered differences were observed; men reported higher levels of family to work conflict (3.16±1.52 to 2.94±1.59, p=0.031), and lower levels of recognition for their work (3.75±1.03 to 3.96±1.06, p=0.004), compared with women. For women, stress (2.94±0.92 to 2.66±0.88, p<0.001) and neck/shoulder pain (4.50±2.90 to 3.51±2.84, p<0.001) were higher than men and they also reported more concerns about their job security than men (3.01±1.33 to 2.78±1.40, p=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS:

Preliminary evidence from the current study suggests that working from home may impact employees' physical and mental health, and that this impact is likely to be gendered. Although further analysis is required, these data provide insights into further research opportunities needed to assist employers in optimising working from home conditions and reduce the potential negative physical and mental health impacts on their employees.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-052733

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-052733