Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A Miniaturized Electrostatic Precipitator Respirator Effectively Removes Ambient SARS-CoV-2 Bioaerosols.
Redmann, Rachel K; Beddingfield, Brandon J; Spencer, Skye; Chirichella, Nicole R; Henley, Julian L; Hager, Wes; Roy, Chad J.
  • Redmann RK; Infectious Disease Aerobiology, Division of Microbiology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
  • Beddingfield BJ; Infectious Disease Aerobiology, Division of Microbiology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
  • Spencer S; Infectious Disease Aerobiology, Division of Microbiology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
  • Chirichella NR; Infectious Disease Aerobiology, Division of Microbiology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
  • Henley JL; Section of Otolaryngology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
  • Hager W; Henley Ion, New Orleans, LA 70115, USA.
  • Roy CJ; Phase Three Product Development, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Viruses ; 14(4)2022 04 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1776363
ABSTRACT
The inhalation of ambient SARS-CoV-2-containing bioaerosols leads to infection and pandemic airborne transmission in susceptible populations. Filter-based respirators effectively reduce exposure but complicate normal respiration through breathing zone pressure differentials; therefore, they are impractical for long-term use.

OBJECTIVES:

We tested the comparative effectiveness of a prototyped miniaturized electrostatic precipitator (mEP) on a filter-based respirator (N95) via the removal of viral bioaerosols from a simulated, inspired air stream.

Methods:

Each respirator was tested within a 16 L environmental chamber housed within a Class III biological safety cabinet within biosafety level 3 containment. SARS-CoV-2-containing bioaerosols were generated in the chamber, drawn by a vacuum through each respirator, and physical particle removal and viral genomic RNA were measured distal to the breathing zone of each device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

The mEP respirator removed particles (96.5 ± 0.4%), approximating efficiencies of the N95 (96.9 ± 0.6%). The mEP respirator similarly decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA (99.792%) when compared to N95 removal (99.942%), as a function of particle removal from the airstream distal to the breathing zone of each respirator.

CONCLUSIONS:

The mEP respirator approximated the performance of a filter-based N95 respirator for particle removal and viral RNA as a constituent of the SARS-CoV-2 bioaerosols generated for this evaluation. In practice, the mEP respirator could provide equivalent protection from ambient infectious bioaerosols as the N95 respirator without undue pressure drop to the wearer, thereby facilitating its long-term use in an unobstructed breathing configuration.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: V14040765

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: V14040765