In severe COVID-19, high-flow vs. conventional oxygen therapy reduced intubation and time to clinical recovery at 28 d.

Carpenter, Christopher R; Steel, Peter A D

Carpenter, Christopher R; Steel, Peter A D.

Carpenter CR; Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA (C.R.C.).
Steel PAD; New York Presbyterian Hospital--Weill Cornell, New York City, New York, USA (P.A.S.).

Ann Intern Med ; 175(4): JC38, 2022 04.

Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1776564

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT

SOURCE CITATION Ospina-Tascón GA, Calderón-Tapia LE, García AF, et al. Effect of high-flow oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy on invasive mechanical ventilation and clinical recovery in patients with severe COVID-19 a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;3262161-71. 34874419.

Subject(s)

COVID-19; Respiratory Insufficiency; COVID-19/therapy; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Oxygen/therapeutic use; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Insufficiency / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ann Intern Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

LILACS

LIS

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google