Risk factor modeled microenvironment effects lymphatics activity and IBC invasiveness and progression

ABSTRACT

Background. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and breast tumor emboli within dermal and breast lymphatic vessels are prognostic for metastatic spread and poor outcomes, and are abundant in Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). IBC is an aggressive breast cancer that presents suddenly with breast swelling and redness due to tumor emboli in lymphatics. Lack of breast-feeding and obesity are IBC risk factors. We sought to demonstrate the combinatorial effects of a high-fat diet and nursing on lymphatic function and compare these to IBC tumor induced changes in lymphatic function. We hypothesize that risk factors for aggressive breast cancer may alter lymphatic function in the normal gland prior to tumor initiation. Methods. Following two rounds of pregnancy in 20 multiparous SCID Beige immunocompromised mice, half of the mice were force weaned while half nursed pups. Prior to forced weaning, half of each of these groups were fed a high fat diet (HFD 60 Kcal %, N = 10) while the other half received a low-fat diet (LFD 10 Kcal %, N = 10). Consecutive dynamic near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) lymphatic imaging was performed at 6-7 months (covid interruption) and 14 months after initiating the diet by injecting a near-IR fluorophore into the mammary fatpad and recording lymphatic pulsing over 8 minutes using V++. Matlab and ImageJ were used to quantify pulsing rates on the ventral lymphatics in each animal. Fatpads were Ssubsequently inoculated with SUM149 IBC cells and imaging was repeated 16 months post diet initiation. Lymphatic imaging over time by HFD vs LFD was further studied in nulliparous animals. Tissues were collected for further analyses. ResultsData analysis prior to tumor injection, demonstrated lymphatic pulsing (pulses/4 minutes) increased over time in HFD force weaned (HFFW) and HFD nursing (HFN) animals only (65.5 vs 72.6, P=0.059;60.1 vs 76.6, P=0.0099, respectively). Comparing HFFW and HFN to matched LFD groups (LFFW and LFN), at 14 weeks HFD was associated with increased pumping after forced weaning (62.3 vs. 72.6, P=0.074), and nursing (62.5 vs 76.6, P=0.0023). There was an increase in pulsing after tumor initiation (16 months after initiation of diet) in all groups (80.1, 84.1, 83.2, 82.4, P > 0.05 all comparisons to initial timepoint). In a separate experiment examining HFD (N=5) vs LFD (N=5) in nulliparous mice, lymphatic contractile activity increased in all animals over. time, average ventral lymphatic contractile frequency for LFD and HFD at week 8, 11 and 14 weeks after diet initiation were 5, 8.64, 15.9 pumps/4 mins vs 11.8, 18.5, 28.2 pumps/4 mins, (P = 0.01, 0.05, and 0.0005 respectively). ConclusionsHFD increased lymphatic pulsing rate over time to a significantly greater extent than LFD continuing over 14 months independent of reproductive and nursing status. Tumor initiation prompted further increased pulsing rates beyond that observed after HFD across all groups. The magnitude of the effect of HFD on lymphatic pulsing approached the rate after tumor initiation, while reproductive variables did not impact lymphatic pulsing. Further studies are warranted to demonstrate the relationship if any between lymphatic pumping pre-initiation and LVI after tumor initiation and examine the role of intervention on reducing LVI.