Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Current challenges of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 seroprevalence studies among blood donors: A scoping review.
Saeed, Sahar; Uzicanin, Samra; Lewin, Antoine; Lieshout-Krikke, Ryanne; Faddy, Helen; Erikstrup, Christian; Osiowy, Carla; Seed, Clive R; Steele, Whitney R; Davison, Katy; Custer, Brian; O'Brien, Sheila F.
  • Saeed S; Epidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Uzicanin S; Epidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Lewin A; Surveillance and Biological Risk Assessment, Héma-Québec, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
  • Lieshout-Krikke R; Department of Medical Affairs, Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Faddy H; School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, Queensland, Australia.
  • Erikstrup C; Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Osiowy C; National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Seed CR; Donor and Product Safety Policy Unit, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Steele WR; Epidemiology and Surveillance Group, Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
  • Davison K; NHS Blood and Transplant/Public Health England Epidemiology Unit, London, UK.
  • Custer B; Research and Scientific Programs, Vitalant, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • O'Brien SF; Epidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Vox Sang ; 117(4): 476-487, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1784755
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Blood donors are increasingly being recognized as an informative resource for surveillance. We aimed to review severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 seroprevalence studies conducted among blood donors to investigate methodological biases and provide guidance for future research. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed and preprint publications between January 2020 and January 2021. Two reviewers used standardized forms to extract seroprevalence estimates and data on methodology pertaining to population sampling, periodicity, assay characteristics, and antibody kinetics. National data on cumulative incidence and social distancing policies were extracted from publicly available sources and summarized.

RESULTS:

Thirty-three studies representing 1,323,307 blood donations from 20 countries worldwide were included (sample sizes ranged from 22 to 953,926 donations). The majority of the studies (79%) reported seroprevalence rates <10% (ranging from 0% to 76% [after adjusting for waning antibodies]). Overall, less than 1 in 5 studies reported standardized seroprevalence rates to reflect the demographics of the general population. Stratification by age and sex were most common (64% of studies), followed by region (48%). A total of 52% of studies reported seroprevalence at a single time point. Overall, 27 unique assay combinations were identified, 55% of studies used a single assay and only 39% adjusted seroprevalence rates for imperfect test characteristics. Among the nationally representative studies, case detection was most underrepresented in Kenya (11264).

CONCLUSION:

By the end of 2020, seroprevalence rates were far from reaching herd immunity. In addition to differences in community transmission and diverse public health policies, study designs and methodology were likely contributing factors to seroprevalence heterogeneity.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Vox Sang Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Vox.13221

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Vox Sang Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Vox.13221