Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Capacity and decision making.
Gray, Ben.
  • Gray B; Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand ben.gray@otago.ac.nz.
J Med Ethics ; 48(12): 1054-1055, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1784881
ABSTRACT
Pickering et al's paper argues that the capacity of the decision-maker is the sole consideration in whether a decision should stand, and that the risk of the decision should not be considered. This argument ignores the existence of the player who is of the view that a decision is not wise. This paper argues that patient autonomy is not the sole determinant of whether a person is able to make an unwise decision, particularly in healthcare where there are always others affected by the patient decision. Rather than asserting that patients have an unfettered autonomous choice on clinical decisions this paper argues that these decisions should be looked at through the lens of quality in health care that has proposed four parameters to be balanced; the patient experience, wise use of resources, the effect on public health and the clinician experience.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Making / Informed Consent Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Med Ethics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Medethics-2022-108287

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Making / Informed Consent Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Med Ethics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Medethics-2022-108287