Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effect of RNA quality to SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR detection from saliva.
Paju, Susanna; Tallgren, Marika; Kivimäki, Anne; Lahdentausta, Laura; Salminen, Aino; Oksanen, Lotta; Sanmark, Enni; Geneid, Ahmed; Pussinen, Pirkko; Pietiäinen, Milla.
  • Paju S; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Tallgren M; PerkinElmer Finland Oy, FI-20101 Turku, Finland.
  • Kivimäki A; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Lahdentausta L; Medical Nutrition Physiology, Pharmacology, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Salminen A; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Oksanen L; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Sanmark E; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Geneid A; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Pussinen P; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland.
  • Pietiäinen M; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
J Med Microbiol ; 71(4)2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1788578
ABSTRACT
Saliva is an alternative sample material to nasopharyngeal swab in SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. We investigated possible aspects to improve the reliability of SARS-CoV-2 detection from saliva. Saliva was collected from asymptomatic healthy subjects (n=133) and COVID-19 patients (n=9). SARS-CoV-2 detection was performed with quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) with two viral and one host target serving as an internal control. The use of internal control revealed that in the first RT-qPCR run 25-30 % of assays failed. The failure is associated with poor RNA quality. When the amount of RNA was cut down to half from the original amount, the performance of RT-qPCR was greatly enhanced (95 % of the assays succeeded). The quality of RNA was not affected by the use of different nucleic acid stabilizing buffers. Our study showed that saliva is suitable material for RT-qPCR based SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, but the use of internal control is essential to distinguish the true negative samples from failed assays.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jmm.0.001507

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jmm.0.001507