Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluating the impacts of tiered restrictions introduced in England, during October and December 2020 on COVID-19 cases: a synthetic control study.
Zhang, Xingna; Owen, Gwilym; Green, Mark A; Buchan, Iain; Barr, Ben.
  • Zhang X; Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK xingna.zhang@liverpool.ac.uk.
  • Owen G; Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Green MA; Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Buchan I; Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Barr B; Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e054101, 2022 04 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1788960
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To analyse the impact on SARS-CoV-2 transmission of tier 3 restrictions introduced in October and December 2020 in England, compared with tier 2 restrictions. We further investigate whether these effects varied between small areas by deprivation.

DESIGN:

Synthetic control analysis.

SETTING:

We identified areas introducing tier 3 restrictions in October and December, constructed a synthetic control group of places under tier 2 restrictions and compared changes in weekly infections over a 4-week period. Using interaction analysis, we estimated whether this effect varied by deprivation and the prevalence of a new variant (B.1.1.7).

INTERVENTIONS:

In both October and December, no indoor between-household mixing was permitted in either tier 2 or 3. In October, no between-household mixing was permitted in private gardens and pubs and restaurants remained open only if they served a 'substantial meal' in tier 3, while in tier 2 meeting with up to six people in private gardens were allowed and all pubs and restaurants remained open. In December, in tier 3, pubs and restaurants were closed, while in tier 2, only those serving food remained open. The differences in restrictions between tier 2 and 3 on meeting outside remained the same as in October. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Weekly reported cases adjusted for changing case detection rates for neighbourhoods in England.

RESULTS:

Introducing tier 3 restrictions in October and December was associated with a 14% (95% CI 10% to 19%) and 20% (95% CI 13% to 29%) reduction in infections, respectively, compared with the rates expected with tier 2 restrictions only. The effects were similar across levels of deprivation and by the prevalence of the new variant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with tier 2 restrictions, additional restrictions in tier 3 areas in England had a moderate effect on transmission, which did not appear to increase socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 cases.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-054101

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-054101