Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A retrospective study on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on dental treatments in adults.
Gómez-Costa, Diego; Ramírez, Juan Manuel; García Guerrero, Iván; Giovannini, Giovanni; Rojo, Rosa; Gómez-de Diego, Rafael.
  • Gómez-Costa D; Doctoral Program in Health Sciences. Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avenida de Atenas s s/n, 28922, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ramírez JM; Department of Nursing and Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avenida de Atenas s/n, 28922, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
  • García Guerrero I; Department of Morphological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Córdoba, Avenida Menéndez Pidal, 7, Córdoba, Spain.
  • Giovannini G; Department of Nursing and Stomatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avenida de Atenas s/n, 28922, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rojo R; Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X el Sabio University, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691, Madrid, Spain.
  • Gómez-de Diego R; Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X el Sabio University, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691, Madrid, Spain. rrojolop@uax.es.
BMC Oral Health ; 22(1): 122, 2022 04 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1789113
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim was to analyze the prevalence of dental treatments that were not performed in a dental care university referral center in the capital of Spain during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective observational study based on the registry of medical records. Sex, age, nationality, and the type of treatment that was not performed in the service of the Integrated Adult Dental Clinic subject of the Dentistry degree at the Rey Juan Carlos University of Madrid were analyzed.

RESULTS:

A total of 392 medical records were analyzed. The prevalence of the treatments that were not performed was 58.67% (95% CI 53.74-63.44) of conservative treatments, 47.45% (95% CI 42.55-52.39) of periodontal treatments, 27.30% (95% CI 23.12-31.91) and 13.52% (95% CI 10.49-17.26) of clinical activities. The patients most affected by the absence of dental treatment ranged in age from 35 to 74 years. Age, sex, and nationality were not influential in not performing dental treatments.

CONCLUSIONS:

The COVID-19 pandemic could have negatively influenced treatments, such as conservative and periodontal treatments, that increasing the risk of tooth loss in adults.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: English Journal: BMC Oral Health Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12903-022-02160-y

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: English Journal: BMC Oral Health Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12903-022-02160-y