Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Comparative Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Versus E-Module on the Training of Donning and Doffing Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized, Simulation-Based Educational Study.
Kravitz, Meryl B; Dadario, Nicholas B; Arif, Adeel; Bellido, Simon; Arif, Amber; Ahmed, Oark; Gibber, Marc; Jafri, Farrukh N.
  • Kravitz MB; Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Wakefield Campus, Bronx, USA.
  • Dadario NB; Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
  • Arif A; Simulation Laboratory, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, USA.
  • Bellido S; Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.
  • Arif A; Simulation Laboratory, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, USA.
  • Ahmed O; Emergency Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Wakefield Campus, Bronx, USA.
  • Gibber M; Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Wakefield Campus, Bronx, USA.
  • Jafri FN; Emergency Medicine, White Plains Hospital, White Plains, USA.
Cureus ; 14(3): e23655, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1791834
ABSTRACT
Introduction Preventing errors in donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical for limiting the spread of infectious diseases. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated itself as an effective tool for asynchronous learning, but its use in PPE training has not been tested. The objective of this study was to compare donning and doffing performance between VR and e-module PPE training. Methods A prospective randomized open-blinded controlled trial was conducted to determine differences in donning and doffing performance after VR and e-module PPE training among medical staff and medical students at a single institution. The primary outcome was donning and doffing performance with real PPE, assessed using a 64-point checklist. The secondary outcome was participant preparedness and confidence level after training.  Results Fifty-four participants were randomized, mostly consisting of medical students (n=24 {44%}) or emergency medicine and otolaryngology residents (n=19 {35%}). The VR group (n=27 {50%}) performed better than the control in the overall PPE scores but this was not statistically significant (mean {SD}, VR 55.4 {4.4} vs e-module 53.3 {8.1}; p = 0.40). VR participants also reported higher levels of preparedness and confidence after training. Residents as a subgroup achieved the highest increases after VR training compared to their counterparts in the control training group (mean {SD}, VR 55.6 {4.9} vs e-module 48.4 {5.5}, p = 0.009).  Conclusion In this randomized trial, VR training was found to be non-inferior to e-module for asynchronous PPE training. Our results suggest that in particular residents may benefit most from VR PPE training. Additionally, VR participants felt more confident and prepared to don and doff PPE after training compared to e-module participants. These findings are particularly relevant given the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Future studies need to focus on VR integration into residency curriculum and monitoring for long-term skill retention.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Cureus Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cureus.23655

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Cureus Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cureus.23655