Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Use of Oral Anticoagulation Is Not Associated With a Reduced Risk of Mortality in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.
Dai, Meng-Fei; Guo, Si-Tong; Ke, Yi-Jun; Wang, Bao-Yan; Yu, Feng; Xu, Hang; Gu, Zhi-Chun; Ge, Wei-Hong.
  • Dai MF; Department of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.
  • Guo ST; School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Ke YJ; Department of Pharmacy, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
  • Wang BY; Department of Pharmacy, The Anqing Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Anqing, China.
  • Yu F; Department of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.
  • Xu H; Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
  • Gu ZC; School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
  • Ge WH; Department of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 781192, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1792960
ABSTRACT

Background:

Hypercoagulability and thromboembolic events are associated with poor prognosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Whether chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) improve the prognosis is yet controversial. The present study aimed to investigate the association between the chronic OAC and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

Methods:

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched to identify studies that evaluated OAC for COVID-19 until 24 July 2021. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed to pool the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of all-cause mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. According to the type of oral anticoagulants [direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)], subgroup and interaction analyses were performed to compare DOACs and VKAs. Meta-regression was performed to explore the potential confounders on all-cause mortality.

Results:

A total of 12 studies involving 30,646 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results confirmed that chronic OAC did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.82-1.03; p = 0.165) or ICU admission (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.40-1.04; p = 0.073) in patients with COVID-19 compared to those without OAC. The chronic use of DOACs did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality compared to VKAs (P interaction = 0.497) in subgroup and interaction analyses. The meta-regression failed to detect any potential confounding on all-cause mortality.

Conclusion:

COVID-19 patients with chronic OAC were not associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and ICU admission compared to those without OAC, and the results were consistent across DOACs and VKA subgroups. Systematic Review Registration clinicaltrials.gov, identifier CRD42021269764.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Front Pharmacol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fphar.2022.781192

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Front Pharmacol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fphar.2022.781192