Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Analysing the impact of COVID-19 risk perceptions on route choice behaviour in train networks.
Shelat, Sanmay; van de Wiel, Thijs; Molin, Eric; van Lint, J W C; Cats, Oded.
  • Shelat S; Department of Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
  • van de Wiel T; Department of Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
  • Molin E; Transport and Logistics Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
  • van Lint JWC; Department of Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
  • Cats O; Department of Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0264805, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1793506
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Unlike previous pandemics, COVID-19 has sustained over a relatively longer period with cyclical infection waves and numerous variants. Public transport ridership has been hit particularly hard. To restore travellers' confidence it is critical to assess their risk determinants and trade-offs.

METHODS:

To this end, we survey train travellers in the Netherlands in order to (i) quantify the impact of trip-specific, policy-based, and pandemic-related attributes on travellers' COVID-19 risk perceptions; and (ii) evaluate the trade-off between this risk perception and other travel attributes. Adopting the hierarchical information integration approach, in a two-stage stated preference experiment, respondents are asked to first rate how risky they perceive different travel situations to be, and then to choose between different travel options that include their own perceived risk rating as an attribute. Perceived risk ratings and choices between travel options are modelled using a linear regression and a mixed multinomial logit model, respectively.

RESULTS:

We find that on-board crowding and infection rates are the most important factors for risk perception. Amongst personal characteristics, the vulnerability of family and friends has the largest impact-nearly twice that of personal health risk. The bridging choice experiment reveals that while values of time have remained similar to pre-pandemic estimates, travellers are significantly more likely to choose routes with less COVID-19 risk (e.g., due to lower crowding). Respondents making longer trips by train value risk four times as much as their shorter trip counterparts. By combining the two models, we also report willingness to pay for mitigating factors reduced crowding, mask mandates, and increased sanitization.

CONCLUSION:

Since we evaluate the impact of a large number of variables on route choice behaviour, we can use the estimated models to predict behaviour under detailed pandemic scenarios. Moreover, in addition to highlighting the importance of COVID-19 risk perceptions in public transport route choices, the results from this study provide valuable information regarding the mitigating impacts of various policies on perceived risk.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Perception / Transportation / Travel / Choice Behavior / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Variants Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0264805

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Perception / Transportation / Travel / Choice Behavior / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Variants Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0264805